Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:46:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:46:48 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:8199 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:46:42 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] moving F0 0F bug check to bugs.h Date: 18 Nov 2001 17:46:09 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: <9t9o91$k6p$1@cesium.transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2001 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: By author: Dave Jones In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > Is there any reason why the F0 0F bug check isn't in bugs.h? > > hpa moved it (And some others) during his 2.3.99 big cleanup of setup.c > and friends. > bugs.h should die, ideally. There is no good reason the checking for features and the checking for bugs is done using different mechanisms, and the bugs.h mechanism is *MUCH* uglier. However, I was planning to wait for 2.5 with that one. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/