Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 23:45:43 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: x86: Clarify the kvm_run.emulation_failure
 structure layout
Message-ID: <YWYeJ9TtfRwBk/5D@google.com>
References: <20210920103737.2696756-1-david.edmondson@oracle.com>
 <20210920103737.2696756-2-david.edmondson@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210920103737.2696756-2-david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, David Edmondson wrote:
> Until more flags for kvm_run.emulation_failure flags are defined, it
> is undetermined whether new payload elements corresponding to those
> flags will be additive or alternative. As a hint to userspace that an
> alternative is possible, wrap the current payload elements in a union.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> ---

To complete the set... :-)

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>