Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:12:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:12:29 -0500 Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-122182.0x3ef30264.bynxx2.customer.tele.dk ([62.243.2.100]:42889 "HELO fugmann.dhs.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:12:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3BF86A86.1010804@fugmann.dhs.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:12:22 +0100 From: Anders Peter Fugmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Jasen Cc: John Jasen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/19/2001 02:07 AM, John Jasen wrote: > On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, John Jasen wrote: > > >>// RH 2.2.19-6.2.1 >>439.35user 54.86system 8:19.45elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k >>0inputs+0outputs (357039major+484758minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> >>// 2.4.12 >> > > 5230.73user 52.88system 1:28:09elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (346527major+482788minor)pagefaults 0swaps Funny how the system time is almost identical, while 10 times as much time is spend in userspace. What does top say while compiling a kernel? (On a 2.4.12 system) I just had this strange thought that the problem might not be with the disc, but a whole other place - like some process hogging the CPU, and not allowing gcc to do its job. How does 'grep -r "somestring"' on 2.4.12 compre to 2.2.19? Regards Anders Fugmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/