Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp3427408pxb; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:56:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+umHq8Xc5SDef2P9GcgHZ1nfSsnEmGrQcFOrxRzuZUB0WaQa/gOS6+PLf7hcTWRbQxVR4 X-Received: by 2002:a63:ce0a:: with SMTP id y10mr27842270pgf.133.1634129804147; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:56:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634129804; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mJX6fxMTGkTgHD8Z2DAtVVU+0o8fVZZesdXjVb0/YHBdNuWZs9PiVtuHojmUkzmq0H I8x4TELiep0+EsSOvfgzm0SipdMNNa2ZndxypkGTOlt7LyBSW3AyFdW/3RHmJb1uP0eq MZM3Sv2m00CdMpSiuHkS8l8s7tPBZN8OogcoJs0/lmqxKKihJqmlHhq5xbE2GXkUywzD sFwXrXdwXpooTbs7JCjetBuHPBiSueshJkCC4UuljZ/6i7W09yP/ELHFAcicVbSq9syf CBBpVchv5CgDHZHebrE0JqorRnjZBwHauW3Ec7NhYTcXF7lX8F3VJDaURGqewvTA5V9p DR9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bua+UvhRZx/vtJpW/R79wAmjzbaBOR2FatQ2gYmLKAk=; b=sOJHot2/vqQuDOyCYsmqHsVWjVnQ9+Rt/ikCO1HY1Gy5y9cHGlniIOtFjyLq4Qfrkq d+lBGUFpybVuekEJ9PpqyDA0OBpR21zG1kH+6Yz2jFQRZvzHcVpZBoM6jdutPKsFbKln getZisB0GuRbxy+8ZTX3gzmOVhPhqpQCDMZpTY0udklEIMu/hV0MGnCoPKKhjNU+Wsql qVrDd6Z/TRgKVQr6kq3U4By/kC/KDGmQXjXZHoenGQEvqmHSKtp4OCj4zpjORz8hSg3Y SpiT03vV8EjZWEzJZZ4acT7Q81eNbc9cNn3GwH0rv/icfIPxqy3RGjmAxmXQnmPlz99T 1sDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=imCDhWuW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p8si19853959plo.244.2021.10.13.05.56.30; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=imCDhWuW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231312AbhJMM5Q (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:57:16 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:48170 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231516AbhJMM5N (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:57:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634129710; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bua+UvhRZx/vtJpW/R79wAmjzbaBOR2FatQ2gYmLKAk=; b=imCDhWuWI5hr9wxKRNm+RZyDWnJUNKV39xwKQtw3TkcLGfdCvLzMrnapy3qlT/MV0lN9Yo GgkZNr7ehYSNFnKhhWxJ6MthVECACrBxnnuYBMn1i7mTJAuQS8x8m5ZhQYvDXohyqkh67p juX97odvt37mrfN0/KE6gNs1Fgz+Z8g= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-481-5TFGFl_wMfOzvTKqoDVnFA-1; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:55:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5TFGFl_wMfOzvTKqoDVnFA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id l8-20020a5d6d88000000b001611b5de796so1903453wrs.10 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:55:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=bua+UvhRZx/vtJpW/R79wAmjzbaBOR2FatQ2gYmLKAk=; b=IT46l2CrIN1vINyjLTTCXubhOoiciomlbzXW3QzeKy6pedWbdgoK6fhaS7iYaDvnN8 Agyhb2rX1xDASZn1CwHuFgnK4WxsAGB+wbuwTbegDSGjtV7+FUTZJt5QNMyIsMAEU/Me cy9KkPVF9aFFrpBKwvLAVEfnvS4YqY01hfC6ApGpLTCwjeADTVb2uKlubbaky/75G2rn qqTG7sGuv/spzgVNA3dNgTrRsMgrMy/HpPcRbMePJY7w8ALmKoZz9KCLV3iCMtQsL4sR +NQTTRgxQ5eVv1BAYQZg59pT00aLUUFrAtsrmkBM2Z4Us6P3Mv/vzual7kWBLtEgdKoN WvOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Lk1tA+9Q6Zq23cEcmjo/w+vzhDHtTNR5xTYVidy8Bs6EolNdC HOfncSC50CfBJ4naSY2mRAOG7RcTg7FuKDxIUvAegkCADjSw0/O9Cf8+BlGkG+kQZfpCs5gRliR RxTolpCwUwBOyBU5VE+RoY+Ms X-Received: by 2002:a1c:22d7:: with SMTP id i206mr13001184wmi.122.1634129708025; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:55:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1c:22d7:: with SMTP id i206mr13001158wmi.122.1634129707894; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2.55.30.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm5445986wme.3.2021.10.13.05.55.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:55:03 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Halil Pasic , Jason Wang , Xie Yongji , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, markver@us.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com, Raphael Norwitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate Message-ID: <20211013085423-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20211011053921.1198936-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20211013060923-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <96561e29-e0d6-9a4d-3657-999bad59914e@de.ibm.com> <20211013081836-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <87zgrdulwp.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zgrdulwp.fsf@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:52:38PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch > >> as we have a regression with 4.14? > > > > Probably. Still trying to decide between this and plain revert for 5.15 > > and back. Maybe both? > > Probably better queue this one, in case we have some undiscovered > problems with the config space access in virtio-net? So both then. I think you are right. Pushed out to -next. Will do a pull towards end of the week. -- MST