Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp3428960pxb; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:58:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXznvEQJxDpgLbYWIOgWPSR0gwvJVSKH4K92uzG3SKTG5VC/GZJK4CRrskBqoN8OwF2tLi X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5255:: with SMTP id t21mr9020615edd.103.1634129922306; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:58:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634129922; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=imAWwC6pGaTCfWfiD66HwvHRyeOeWv+DTAMkeCVHDpRbFr8YNfCKnVSoH0I7WwacGU eqAPTjXm01bRfvU3FSiB0LUsBrA1ztN7DMbMgP3xDU1tcDXBPfWxh/N+Xfh40KAATrX2 QfoLk64axlIC0j5rcA3p06+aw4qwYRhV3caWpVQaPuXwujiZQC8ep9iRMLu0kQyR7etk 7SZ3KFEzcYOWkWliwcMfaJzGN0TZokP9QbEU7KxwEyDSsKCqMTgC+vBVd6OGr8u+m/8M udT8xupLLMQ4JqeOvXYWv6HHgtuUzzPIL+cqfHB24vQqEfE+3qQXQBudwomkxRDtx5Mn D7Fw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:sender:references:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=sIcUI8mTmZIydzUXeyZ3J5UffwR7mSdChbwCl8LylUM=; b=pOq5bve91DESBE8P906F49JGVywFFxOZbor/sMFDL9CEsZKNyVJmh9gmO5VwH1Bgp9 kHKrK7w9muvzWGTs0QeDSJ+iOJ+HJRAoeRzMpzjf68wP19xeGFaBygfaw78KFNU37Tzx KTXs7ctYVR34SpuwNrCSQ8nSnnu568Xl1dCvlUIkqO2V2fZdoiLkF0PpS4eWzSxADk3V m7CoT+6fsE9pou/uBRWUVM0fetIBaLYyggXnlMsCwuNSFCYjvAIalCEsfR13FQS1bVOb vjOe2RXpaAIzIA/C0vcKaSZzuRL14HgDnziHBaUBaVgkck9ELALMh1UPqpEHChhaStCk 975w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@piap.pl header.s=mail header.b=lXXv7SrH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=piap.pl Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e8si19909020ejh.79.2021.10.13.05.58.18; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@piap.pl header.s=mail header.b=lXXv7SrH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=piap.pl Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232645AbhJMM6D (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:58:03 -0400 Received: from ni.piap.pl ([195.187.100.5]:50132 "EHLO ni.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233859AbhJMM6C (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:58:02 -0400 Received: from t19.piap.pl (OSB1819.piap.pl [10.0.9.19]) by ni.piap.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F607C36955D; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:55:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ni.piap.pl 6F607C36955D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=piap.pl; s=mail; t=1634129755; bh=sIcUI8mTmZIydzUXeyZ3J5UffwR7mSdChbwCl8LylUM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lXXv7SrHezO9kprc+RtdzBI7iBhj783hV76a5IuI0UjebTi7qPoMsjvMvZ1LIEBpv lsfDkcZGq/ysQQoIpP/FujsUF5sfGzuXPru4qkl9xt2f19YN93QkgcbF8zMVLBrUg/ a62IU7oigYVV8vbcZFm+RIeTquM1vnYH/wp2GgM4= From: =?utf-8?Q?Krzysztof_Ha=C5=82asa?= To: Jacopo Mondi Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , Sakari Ailus , Matteo Lisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Driver for ON Semi AR0521 camera sensor References: <20211009102446.jrvrdr7whtd2rv4z@uno.localdomain> <20211011143420.vm6ncl5gdv44nsn3@uno.localdomain> <20211013082634.53zh5j26gucddome@uno.localdomain> Sender: khalasa@piap.pl Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:55:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20211013082634.53zh5j26gucddome@uno.localdomain> (Jacopo Mondi's message of "Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:26:34 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 3 X-KLMS-Message-Action: skipped X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, whitelist X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: not scanned, whitelist X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, not scanned, whitelist Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jacopo Mondi writes: > You have never been told before, while submitting code to Linux, not > to use C++ comments ? Are you surprised someone contests that ? Surprised, far from it. Linus has decided C++ comments are ok. I simply follow his advice (C++ comments are, after all, technically a little bit better). > No driver in media (which I'm aware of) uses C++ comments. > Your one is entirely commented with C++ comments. > > They all try to stay in the 80-cols limit. > Yours have lines that span to 140 cols and goes regularly over 100. Linus has already (in 2016 IIRC) said 80 cols are BS. This is BTW what several people (me included) postulated long before. Would it make sense to use this limit now? If the above constitutes being "alien", well, don't worry about it. > Ok, I give up then, feels like a waste of time reviewing a driver > (for the only sake of code consistency) and have every single comment > contested. Please note a didn't contest your every comment. Actually, I have contested only those... which I contested, by definition. I have (perhaps too silently) accepted the rest. > Documentation/driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile.rst > > and has there suggested have the patch go through > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=3D80 You suggest I'm to fix this (.rst) file first? I think I can at least try. >> I'd love to get rid of the be(), though. What do you propose instead? > > Mode based sensor drivers usually rely on long register tables, whose > writing is an expensive operation to be done at streamon time. Power > up is usually done at devnode open time but you relay on the legacy > s_power() here, It's been suggested I get rid of it, and I'm going to do exactly this. > so it's in control of the receiver driver which > depending on the implemenation might call it at open() time or stream > on. Sorry, I didn't notice that, has you register a devnode I assumed > you had an open() function, which you don't. Should I have one? Why? Are other drivers expected to have an open()? Shouldn't I register a devnode? > The efficiency argument holds as long as we are in an hot path and I > understand writing 216 registers in pairs has an overhead which to > me, at open devnode open time is marginal, but if done at streamon time > should be avoided. It *may*be* marginal in some cases, but it you have a single I^2 bus for a bunch of devices, some of them e.g. MEMS, it may be as well critical. >> Just tested it and it works for me in 1920x1080p30 without any changes. >> Would it be possible it's the gain/exposure settings? If not, what exact >> clock frequency (for the chip) do you use? > > 24Mhz I will try to use that. What SoC (or MIPI receiver) are you using? > The difference is that the 0x3xxx ones are frame synchronized and > apply to 'bad frames' too. Is it stated in the docs? >> I don't think so. I think, in proprietary development, nobody cares >> about what does the chip send while not streaming. >> > > afaict only imx6 has this check enforced (but I might be wrong) Possibly only in the official tree (not the FSL/NXP). >> How would you do that? >> If you disable streaming, LP-11 is gone. >> You need STREAMING to actually "stream" LP-11. > > Even for test mode ? So for you streamoff is: > - Enable test mode (programmed to be LP-11) > - Start stream > ? That's correct. LP-11 here *is* a test mode. > Anyway, should the AR0521_REG_RESET_RESTART bit be dropped ? Not sure. Why do you think so? > I don't have a way to test LP-11 state, On i.MX6 you can read a MIPI RX status register. IIRC the results may be a bit unclear, though - using an oscilloscope removes any doubt. >> But it doesn't say EBUSY MUST BE returned when the sensor is streaming, >> only that it MAY BE returned. Looking at the code, I can see nothing >> forcing the EBUSY (subdev_do_ioctl(VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT) -> > > There's nothing in the core that has the notion of 'active streaming' Come on. It appears Linux (from top to the bottom) will accept set_fmt while streaming. With certain (most?) drivers only, that's it. Not that I actually tested it, but the v4l2 core code suggests it. So I'm either to return -EBUSY, or - as others, probably most drivers - update the registers. I can't just drop it on the floor, and let the driver apply it on the next s_stream(1)... can I? > I hardly see a case where changing format on the sensor through an > operation on the subdev while streaming, is a good idea. I'm not in control of this. > Also, your s_fmt() and s_frame_interval() call write_mode() which > stops the streaming and it doesn't get restarted. I think that's > wrong and it's an undesired side effect. That would be wrong indeed, but I can't see it in the code. write_mode() stop streaming only momentarily, I can't avoid this. s_frame_interval() returns -EBUSY if streaming (which I guess I should remove). If not for the return, it wouldn't stop streaming either. I will do some experiments, though. > (Also had a chat with Hans about this, the takeaway is that it's a > really bad idea and you need very strong reasons to allow that. It > could be considered for extreme cases like changing the color spaces of > reducing the image size as the allocated buffers are big enough but > again, you need very strong reasons to do so) Ah, buffers are a different story. You can't, for example, request buffers which streaming etc. This is a completely different territory. Now... I don't have buffers :-) It's a MIPI sensor, the output is a bunch of LVDS lines. Certain devices (like THC63LVD104C, an LVDS -> parallel receiver) simply always stream (well, not in powerdown and not without incoming clock). They don't even notice that some format has maybe changed. A MIPI sensor is a bit smarter than that, but buffers - it's the receiver's problem. --=20 Krzysztof "Chris" Ha=C5=82asa Sie=C4=87 Badawcza =C5=81ukasiewicz Przemys=C5=82owy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiar=C3=B3w PIAP Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warszawa