Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp3748031pxb; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:07:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbbSl++jfWKykDUP5KiVWWWwci/9Z+bs4fPKG79caTR1YyrrTw+aOZS1V1PCLndUm545w3 X-Received: by 2002:a65:6215:: with SMTP id d21mr819110pgv.62.1634152028024; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:07:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634152028; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g8PwA3nDhBEO4XYzZnYV1LZ/IPSwitoBx401wcqIOngcRc/wCK1dMagt/6GmxHhqkx C+PVNG4DQOvtRW4g+JC0JEC2ZxOW5iY2PlIqtMsGqQW9TaKprdTOuWzsSPkUuzrvRxkQ Zy8O4MRgKfixEPdbikVUCaDlHWpAWs2qN2koRVtHqhlFdIO2DuGX0D4ejWQgYuLgpiWc V+4BjQ8r3fCpgwlHppETiuZ3I0xlaD4TtRycOU21d45Dk0qnnk26lXHRh3R1OSccBrvm LEXjm0WMmsqTJ7ke5vj95hyQKd3JqPuKMq1jglDxnymbbgH7rAxUSVWeNrruVXhkm9w6 XVsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=7Eiv40w3h1hcVei6B4W9Y1LVqxQiJmLHN86qfNssdwM=; b=JBQbr+A7rR+zjtZGNiWdsLYIGWssy0pbbnjmZwNXeuwOr0Y9/kP10OPsiZ9Wj8I8KV 8H06dxauFZ6wstx73RZnEDMOjOcfjufVSCTL0E+TVbzcKalQg1sr81LxLOqjO8MdMJ8s 5L+Kd3505/i/pEwxUGigw33z3GV682vgEb/KMiuIpnctrgpFnAgHl2jyf1siKBSrKY4k P1A+fk90/gzs3npQ+ZaNl80v3hV94abUD8mr65PVVDGcsYTgqn1YsqfIhDoKAtrVxz03 C9hAU9FpgBv5VX7jKs/UVGGCkuvf3SnDAD1TSIrmHgxFwJeVBiHrJ6jyNQWjkFTHVQM5 9EBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fBk95QVv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u36si482366pgl.231.2021.10.13.12.06.55; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fBk95QVv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235893AbhJMTHs (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:07:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:55228 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234649AbhJMTHo (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:07:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634151940; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7Eiv40w3h1hcVei6B4W9Y1LVqxQiJmLHN86qfNssdwM=; b=fBk95QVvTKSn7D8NZUtoxSN2r5cmkBzbM9mgw1TM+E3wPKvLNEreSnfEvNSYq55gaEhJv1 pNpaJS4bkBFoD09Zj+QyQ2JARVgX6h8TNmroZKPzqG01np2yili1axD6TxGzuGLfcaIT3o r9OebhEF+HcxJeQ8V17nNIEALAOR5T4= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-357-sCSz0iVYO6WRaTK6KClOqQ-1; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:05:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: sCSz0iVYO6WRaTK6KClOqQ-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id s12-20020a50dacc000000b003dbf7a78e88so98792edj.2 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Eiv40w3h1hcVei6B4W9Y1LVqxQiJmLHN86qfNssdwM=; b=g8FBT81q5gkOAwZu4p2QJXoHVi50cn04xxs1jwhNBOxhzktRdNLRdCnNwK03whCKmL vdoV5arXaDBGwU4FiQI+D5UVx3MLdPbH5XePiP2z5IYwkWCXeyS0dQS511aHUuSMsbS0 YT1ItGHQx6pqy84lwDpEeyqSFSDdhCqSI+i7mwKj9RZ+zafpB7YWAww2NHObuSKKcxyL vrAkjYrNDdFLrN61wPOX/QcMCGkopkynBHkw8HYtSWcE7TaG8beRRZvqBbL0kvDXNAKB V85QWY7MD5VnKuuZbpchOS8rq8bPkArEs+s1SH09iBvxV0kBQt7gEIHETOwAl/AYgB+T 6Npw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312V49xAY9PfAxRlVuJc5c/9yBgFOMfHldR1TqZ34rg8xrpJLL3 yI6CZXtzLKVxwIL+jHWaBZeoOV/VrpAmv9VVB9aUqRtz8AKzGSYFvc1tdPgf0MkURaLmqyI+Yf2 ZIkCTsZ+yc3OZqbTLoTud31Qw X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf02:: with SMTP id f2mr1749035edk.226.1634151935667; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf02:: with SMTP id f2mr1748397edk.226.1634151931214; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r22sm278778ejd.109.2021.10.13.12.05.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:05:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: kvm crash in 5.14.1? Content-Language: en-US To: Salvatore Bonaccorso , Stephen Cc: djwong@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, seanjc@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, hagen@jauu.net References: <85e40141-3c17-1dff-1ed0-b016c5d778b6@gmail.com> <2cd8af17-8631-44b5-8580-371527beeb38@gmail.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/10/21 21:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:00:39PM -0700, Stephen wrote: >>> I'll try to report back if I see a crash; or in roughly a week if the >> system seems to have stabilized. >> >> Just wanted to provide a follow-up here and say that I've run on both >> v5.14.8 and v5.14.9 with this patch and everything seems to be good; no >> further crashes or problems. > > In Debian we got a report as well related to this issue (cf. > https://bugs.debian.org/996175). Do you know did the patch felt > through the cracks? Yeah, it's not a KVM patch so the mm maintainers didn't see it. I'll handle it tomorrow. Paolo