Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [mcgrof:modules-next 1/1] include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18:
 warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but
 argument 3 has type 'Elf32_Off' {aka 'unsigned int'}
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <202110140056.Fb6aizTM-lkp@intel.com>
 <c4be5b17-3071-0d99-f896-40040c81d9d3@linuxfoundation.org>
 <YWdNL8m5A3qtIm24@bombadil.infradead.org>
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <5a482ade-7e73-ba6f-457e-75dfdb80a2c8@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:16:36 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YWdNL8m5A3qtIm24@bombadil.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/13/21 3:18 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 11:09:15AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>> We can introduce arch specific header print routine. Easy option is not
>> printing any info., which we know isn't very useful.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts.
> 
> You found an issue without the debug prints, and so you'd know better if
> the effort is worth the trouble, so I'll let you decide.
> 

Right the issue with validate_section_offset() is separate from the debug.
I will fix the pr_err warns first by tweaking the messages to not print
the variables that cause problems.

I will send a separate patch for validate_section_offset() which needs to
be arch specific similar to elf_check_arch().

Let me know if this plan sounds good.

thanks,
-- Shuah