Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932186AbWLZKZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Dec 2006 05:25:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932190AbWLZKZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Dec 2006 05:25:50 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:54802 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932186AbWLZKZt (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Dec 2006 05:25:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:25:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc2 Message-Id: <20061226022538.13ea8b3f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061225225616.GA22307@iucha.net> References: <20061225224047.GB6087@iucha.net> <20061225225616.GA22307@iucha.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3080 Lines: 66 On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 16:56:16 -0600 florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha) wrote: > > The dmesg from the client machine is attached. > > Now, really. > > BTW, I am using NFSv4 exported async from the server and mounted > without any extra options on the client. > > florin > > -- > Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. > http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 > > > [the_oops text/plain (9.9KB)] > [ 2844.871895] BUG: scheduling while atomic: cp/0x20000000/2965 > [ 2844.871900] > [ 2844.871901] Call Trace: > [ 2844.871910] [] __sched_text_start+0x5d/0x7a6 > [ 2844.871914] [] submit_bio+0x84/0x8b > [ 2844.871918] [] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xe4 > [ 2844.871922] [] __pagevec_lru_add+0xb6/0xc6 > [ 2844.871927] [] mpage_bio_submit+0x22/0x26 > [ 2844.871931] [] unix_poll+0x0/0xa4 > [ 2844.871936] [] __cond_resched+0x1c/0x44 > [ 2844.871940] [] cond_resched+0x29/0x30 > [ 2844.871943] [] __reacquire_kernel_lock+0x26/0x44 > [ 2844.871948] [] thread_return+0xa3/0xe1 > [ 2844.871953] [] unlock_page+0x9/0x26 > [ 2844.871957] [] __cond_resched+0x1c/0x44 > [ 2844.871961] [] cond_resched+0x29/0x30 > [ 2844.871965] [] generic_writepages+0x113/0x2d8 > [ 2844.871970] [] nfs_writepage+0x0/0x22 > [ 2844.871976] [] nfs_writepages+0x45/0x13c > [ 2844.871980] [] do_writepages+0x20/0x2d > [ 2844.871984] [] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x51/0x5b > [ 2844.871989] [] filemap_write_and_wait+0x17/0x31 > [ 2844.871993] [] nfs_setattr+0x98/0x108 > [ 2844.871996] [] mntput_no_expire+0x19/0x7b > [ 2844.872000] [] link_path_walk+0xc5/0xd7 > [ 2844.872005] [] current_fs_time+0x3b/0x40 > [ 2844.872009] [] notify_change+0x122/0x22f > [ 2844.872014] [] do_utimes+0x106/0x129 > [ 2844.872019] [] vfs_read+0xaa/0x152 > [ 2844.872023] [] sys_futimesat+0x3c/0x4b > [ 2844.872027] [] system_call+0x7e/0x83 > [ 2844.872030] This is the second report we've had where bit 29 of ->preempt_count is getting set. I don't think there's any legitimate way in which that bit can get set. (Ingo?) I'd suggested that the first report (which was in i386 iirc) was due to memory corruption (hardware or software). And this might also be a hardware error, but that's looking pretty unlikely now. If this is real, it's going to be hard to find, unless someone finds a way to make it happen with some repeatability. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/