Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp4501529pxb; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:31:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgJWli0ixlKAKiT3S/7RYaGj4YTwWaqRcvciHOcIA4ohBLLQuednGQFb38ZL7ZhXP66zFv X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:934c:b0:13d:c685:229b with SMTP id g12-20020a170902934c00b0013dc685229bmr5017803plp.25.1634218268038; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:31:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634218268; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tBbXkej6YKWtgRE43OrilVPlx0wrMkMLeeSlalpmUrc4QxszQZGnh27JznvmC83/Uz WZZkchz4XX7cjs/B2Bp5seEmHvAQKzg/mbMRHyQPYbu7w5nYsa5EQ9SwYImPI6UubWnw 4qqtH95AH2bnawLd58jd106t9L7IofZy3aivXxfJcF6l+aJXBLVBhJZL7SCZwLopV0lj wTaPmGFB5yUqztk9RjakxddD+RkvmxhEDzbBJgFGgMHA9ChtTF9/HLQeBReqI5K4LS2c 9MfZjC/oH1prtKBjhkkP+Hg1cnGJXn9H7J0XNuEads62xddmVhbakljfnNbcW2dTHjUE 6kvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=99iSQ+709Ezt4B+CpYDUH621bTSBpoAdFuDg5RRZpHo=; b=PRqN96fQQmTbu33x8G8wx2vvtJUtLylon1hlnBSdG+kGuFdkEcEPpLfgCPSCTOFt0j iYgZY+LKULAlaA+pPvvweMeAVmj0QSIzmA63GKpJyYouTp46HzGvE60reo7hM4YZP7UC WkzDHh0RFcxzn8sux8VtEz0PijtmZD3sCfBUeVAY+5ziU9whMkgUVvIxtOTwHA2dPbuc maJvVad/e4eanFBZdbrXn5GnI+VLUEogzUQ8CorpiK9dLCKUZUJzRP67HlqbHIo9xkHG Oe9AAgypqzYNs4F8INX7BErCSdHl6N+y1I8fuoAENK85S9XHMKTVPXkmWUQWwpNQKsT5 Xx3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j73si3361160pge.284.2021.10.14.06.30.52; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 06:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230467AbhJNNbA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:31:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51632 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230137AbhJNNa7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:30:59 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D6B460E8B; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:28:50 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Miroslav Benes Cc: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= , Guo Ren , Ingo Molnar , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Petr Mladek , Joe Lawrence , Colin Ian King , Masami Hiramatsu , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Nicholas Piggin , Jisheng Zhang , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock() Message-ID: <20211014092850.101ceaee@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com> <7e4738b5-21d4-c4d0-3136-a096bbb5cd2c@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 11:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Miroslav Benes wrote: > for the livepatch part of the patch. > > I would also ask you not to submit new versions so often, so that the > other reviewers have time to actually review the patch set. > > Quoting from Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: > > "Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - > possibly longer during busy times like merge windows." Although, for updates on a small patch set, I would say just a couple of days, instead of a week. It's annoying when you have a 15 patch set series, that gets updated on a daily basis. But for something with only 2 patches, wait just two days. At least, that's how I feel. -- Steve