Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp347307pxb; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:45:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyPZuLFszGJljXcIA/y/W3xHgETvo4YajUYWa0s3hButvv1pbUSiVAdH/OsnjJe9yicsbl X-Received: by 2002:a63:ef58:: with SMTP id c24mr9063956pgk.299.1634305505383; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:45:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634305505; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ebj8A01pUCQQnlbWlSoNXlbudGmEKjXzaNXepSnNSE7HbQOYi6fqC/S5UEzhB28QmP ReccFvxlZEOw3z4eiQTlzJmkvL3pS0r7DDtdsdwE0CC0MGqqFpCytnHi1KI0niZPYyUF ZtcHkcJ3y5NOYqRv4aJtCM9eLOKRAUMlcq4WU/3yKZ8bZYEJ2A+GDHQY2jLBcr6qsAo5 hW9rPlhPq9U4WGFK2DH9N4hxcNiMxl8i67SoPx7YDYx+VQJ6behTDnzd4Y7caeO57AV9 az3tk9nSHt91Xc0FUQ1g4EJmEPACIPUFdg2//gEf6tWOVww4z7ctf1Tvp43gy2tvATNa 0/dQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=d0w0ChhMOscwGggFdUrkhTfar3D9R6E6Mjk7uRWJg1A=; b=gC28RuFQQ4WFnHXGA+DvQm05N5oJtAjKZiDExOLZk7iZirZTPY5Gi3GCi5juGBLLgk 6Y4WHSFj49CqfUomiaGrAmioUGJPszcpCDo67WRmiFNJKNsItqNMnOlbVcN0nvcuQk7Y bWvJDrZbt/ojxFISds6TVyeXauI9Fj1uequ3F/aw44YYB5XumqjAOkEVZc6qH9EPBe29 1BxKteBiWl7+5IF3TRR+Sr3UPXfzt/ZV0Js7iIJYmKORZC+65zKzwh3dGHlfK7vB3fXR 5Dh+Uq8svOAaZ2omnxeW8aOqntNZU+xEs6rsvc0HYyxCXT7Z4oyXxRv3o4JIFziQsFmO kIZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1si7546996pfm.273.2021.10.15.06.44.29; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236132AbhJOHfT (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 03:35:19 -0400 Received: from honk.sigxcpu.org ([24.134.29.49]:55170 "EHLO honk.sigxcpu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231854AbhJOHfS (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 03:35:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by honk.sigxcpu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF786FB03; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:33:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at honk.sigxcpu.org Received: from honk.sigxcpu.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (honk.sigxcpu.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ednuw0b_LAvH; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:33:08 +0200 From: Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Laurent Pinchart , Jyri Sarha , Tomi Valkeinen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: Ignore -EPROBE_DEFER when bridge attach fails Message-ID: References: <00493cc61d1443dab1c131c46c5890f95f6f9b25.1634068657.git.agx@sigxcpu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sam, On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:35:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Guido, > > > > > > > > > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > > > > - DRM_ERROR("failed to attach bridge %pOF to encoder %s: %d\n", > > > > - bridge->of_node, encoder->name, ret); > > > > + DRM_ERROR("failed to attach bridge %pOF to encoder %s: %d\n", > > > > + bridge->of_node, encoder->name, ret); > > > > > > It would be better to use drm_probe_err(). > > > > That's what i thought initially but since the rest here uses DRM_* > > logging i stuck with it. Happy to change that though. > > If we continue to use the deprecated DRM_ logging functions then we will > never get rid of them. And then I like the simplicity of > drm_probe_err(). I wasn't aware those are deprecated. I'll fix that up in case this patch is needed, which https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAMty3ZAsn4K0WFRC_FNN2Mina0gSu4Nc1y1zVsoZ8GuSqcQFsA@mail.gmail.com/ makes it a bit look like it. Cheers, -- Guido > > In the end it is up to you. > > Sam >