Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210927141921.1760209-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com>
 <20211013090254.GA9901@lpieralisi>
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <220f6cfb-80b1-44db-ce1d-462af5dbf74e@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:53:52 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211013090254.GA9901@lpieralisi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2021/10/13 17:02, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:03:29PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning:
>>>
>>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc
>>> The function next_platform_timer() references
>>> the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc.
>>> This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata
>>> annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong.
>>>
>>> This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined
>>> despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue,
>>> and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems
>>> better anyway.
>>
>> There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1],
>> but not merged yet.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/
> 
> My bad, we did not coordinate well - I noticed your Acked-by but as a
> rule we should also CC LAKML and Catalin/Will (if they aren't CCed) on
> the reply to make sure they can actually see it.

It's my bad. I will make sure LAKML and Catalin/Will are CCed next time
when I reply the email.

Thanks
Hanjun