Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210928121040.2547407-1-chenwandun@huawei.com>
 <CALvZod4G3SzP3kWxQYn0fj+VgG-G3yWXz=gz17+3N57ru1iajw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8fc5e1ae-a356-6225-2e50-cf0e5ee26208@huawei.com> <1634261360.fed2opbgxw.astroid@bobo.none>
 <d1f7249d-ffc2-7038-ed4c-f7fbb3e68eda@huawei.com> <1634281763.ecsq6l88ia.astroid@bobo.none>
In-Reply-To: <1634281763.ecsq6l88ia.astroid@bobo.none>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:51:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CANn89i+RoCSBB=st4yDoWCHDkPCw2OTgbKUeXKRC8ixFLjx4TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix numa spreading for large hash tables
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc:     Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        guohanjun@huawei.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:11 AM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay. It would be better to do it as two patches. First the minimal fix
> so it can be backported easily and have the Fixes: tag pointed at my
> commit. Then the performance optimization.
>

+2, we need a small fix for stable branches.

Thanks

> Thanks,
> Nick