Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754684AbWL0TfR (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:35:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754721AbWL0TfR (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:35:17 -0500 Received: from tmailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.23]:39605 "EHLO tmailer.gwdg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754684AbWL0TfQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:35:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:35:16 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux tcp stack behavior change In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 18 On Dec 27 2006 03:03, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >I have been noticing that running nmap -sF on oneself does not generate >a reply from the TCP stack on 2.6.18(.5). In other words: [...] Alright same behavior on 2.6.13 and nmap 3.81, so the problem is somewhere on my side having misdocumented something back then. -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/