Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp2611418pxb; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 20:27:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBhi5Qdyi+ph4uH1NWs0TQlpz2INQIpHxeFzVcpqqantM0aOH0mZzVj68zBI2GeV6x3k8+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1804:: with SMTP id lw4mr30129964pjb.174.1634527652892; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 20:27:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634527652; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RTspHLR5IHiyY47plYBOZF2OAB9YXwbtdXS8QbLHMaZ8ml/XrOh6R4FBWAfqnMRhn9 gtivIR2glYOm3wpHzY/bXrOI6SmpEwin+f99TMDpHYBajpgMIFltJQCswOIelYFBXIyG XjSLPWcwkUSdTjsYNCGY8WivAuKbtCUHF9Blqmt0xj7hTwurpr9uPAWh6N1YisDIhfCj CosMEhXS3h2q0CoZZwLJ30qeV1zQjpssegAfMrHoK9h7PGs2QKZATsZq91urFE/LSu3Z vRvQwLa6kCa6u59qqAQzwlOOGlVRtZsKp43woSOSxfz13S9Pti7UFlWpcdJsYl91Dvy3 9f6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=OdcCM/Em1aeeSM7r6bkCUN5vs+RH78Cpx4QO2uCS/2E=; b=jyOf+mzLYiHwMbIkBUIoYRM/Cy746oAHZfGxjVcUMg3RhQY8TyV6ml3x8mbX07+v+e ELS8K3OhIZ3rKQtqSE6Y4ls10gC4YaJ4F+WRuOLTV/yhpHp4FUAkC4V9LZXmkfWNOujR Liz32g1Ja3jzTiW8ohXiWmq/m8y8M8ywk1lIfupNhH8AR2m7fZ8HXUHsv5KZU0B973+k alf8kIEvrhqXTWmbyYIfGfXx/wvYcMRM/pv3PFW/AjZMnTnvsuT1+GNYFz428QxTeaaJ f1gUIeaKO1d2uDzuMJOfP1pTDWxiFFz1tKxY9wUXN4uOu4sPpdVwaPdmpxULjP0t2rdU w4aQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=pHSJIajd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i126si18676413pfg.228.2021.10.17.20.27.20; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 20:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=pHSJIajd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236300AbhJPFDp (ORCPT + 98 others); Sat, 16 Oct 2021 01:03:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236843AbhJPFDm (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2021 01:03:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB556C061762 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id m67so16134547oif.6 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OdcCM/Em1aeeSM7r6bkCUN5vs+RH78Cpx4QO2uCS/2E=; b=pHSJIajdjgwWNI6fhsZatcKz7IWLrS/C9RgHioIiUUs68hCbMwY1ugUDU4JPEDfp6O PWXAoLubTIkU2Qgnia5OmO4FkFL/FCI9V11xtG8V9V2SqWIQLRrUcZIV5rnwkfDwE0Gg u6G/xfz8CcZjcShv9brjP/3l1a5ROMCo7OVIQMNKmaug1788YMsxZERb7Vq7qMvXADp3 YdV5QoXO6uZ8fu+lwPqqCZdHPj8k/vHmuvw7JE2rcEBLodDw1TIo0pb8FY51ZGmINyDw 80Vfdx609ayvXYpmJ5x+yG5qOMALaU6ChaLTrHVYSIbqKiwe0K6pdZKhcO0S12hTaQFw RhKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OdcCM/Em1aeeSM7r6bkCUN5vs+RH78Cpx4QO2uCS/2E=; b=IOwauBGVpB8HpysTq5y2KAUy9wU9xD89+tfMmXYkTbbW2yjxocZuzAtLVY5VHgMH3Y 9MrZ4ijWUDexxX1CTQQXrA12hgsAic3LXxmM6eN2oInMH1k2ALqhTOmysUPozHZyl6WV Ld0huxoLwj/MFXXZPYC1mNk+umQduZ6UXNhnM5BIHyV6dBj/GIn9EhRlW3/dN53etyhB KFDzu7y7TZbEozeSWAZ2e95SlS0rNSGLwnFGsPqsssToCJ8ZNjI5wWcOEOcZMMsxxrkt EJSUlYNFvmYCKCofETGz0xQcl3fyhWD/d8amy5aHiO6b0dJF0bwyaXEbzsFbBCixDYzc OgEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lwxNjGQeHuF9J1XneoGUrHTx5GsTGDdLKAboJ7eP9Pm1s0clm UFBJIv7albHBoRTebLXQzU1Pmw== X-Received: by 2002:aca:ef02:: with SMTP id n2mr19214762oih.156.1634360494036; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoga ([2600:1700:a0:3dc8:74c9:deff:fe1a:d52c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j12sm1664203ota.47.2021.10.15.22.01.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 00:01:31 -0500 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Deepak Kumar Singh , swboyd@chromium.org, clew@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] rpmsg: core: Add signal API support Message-ID: References: <1633015924-881-1-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org> <1633015924-881-2-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org> <20211011180245.GA3817586@p14s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211011180245.GA3817586@p14s> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 11 Oct 13:02 CDT 2021, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good day Deepak, > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:02:01PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote: > > Some transports like Glink support the state notifications between > > clients using signals similar to serial protocol signals. > > Local glink client drivers can send and receive signals to glink > > clients running on remote processors. > > > > Add apis to support sending and receiving of signals by rpmsg clients. > > > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Kumar Singh > > --- > > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h | 2 ++ > > include/linux/rpmsg.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c > > index 9151836..5cae50c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c > > @@ -327,6 +327,24 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend_offchannel); > > > > +/** > > + * rpmsg_set_flow_control() - sets/clears searial flow control signals > > + * @ept: the rpmsg endpoint > > + * @enable: enable or disable serial flow control > > + * > > + * Returns 0 on success and an appropriate error value on failure. > > + */ > > +int rpmsg_set_flow_control(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, bool enable) > > +{ > > + if (WARN_ON(!ept)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (!ept->ops->set_flow_control) > > + return -ENXIO; > > + > > + return ept->ops->set_flow_control(ept, enable); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_set_flow_control); > > + > > I'm looking at this patchset as the introduction of an out-of-bound > control interface. But looking at the implementation of the GLINK's > set_flow_control() the data is sent in-band, making me perplexed about > introducing a new rpmsg_endpoint_ops for something that could be done > from user space. Especially when user space is triggering the message > with an ioctl in patch 3. > GLINK is built around one fifo per processor pair, similar to a virtqueue. So the signal request is muxed in the same pipe as data requests, but the signal goes alongside data request, not within them. > Moreover this interface is case specific and doesn't reflect the > generic nature found in ept->sig_cb. > The previous proposal from Deepak was to essentially expose the normal tty flags all the way down to the rpmsg driver. But I wasn't sure how those various flags should be interpreted in the typical rpmsg driver. I therefor asked Deepak to change it so the rpmsg api would contain a single "pause incoming data"/"resume incoming data" - given that this is a wish that we've seen in a number of discussions. Unfortunately I don't have any good suggestion for how we could implement this in the virtio backend at this time, but with the muxing of all the different channels in the same virtqueue it would be good for a driver to able to pause the inflow on a specific endpoint, to avoid stalling other communication when a driver can't receive more messages. Regards, Bjorn > > /* > > * match a rpmsg channel with a channel info struct. > > * this is used to make sure we're not creating rpmsg devices for channels > > @@ -514,6 +532,9 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev) > > > > rpdev->ept = ept; > > rpdev->src = ept->addr; > > + > > + if (rpdrv->signals) > > + ept->sig_cb = rpdrv->signals; > > } > > > > err = rpdrv->probe(rpdev); > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h > > index a76c344..dcb2ec1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h > > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct rpmsg_device_ops { > > * @trysendto: see @rpmsg_trysendto(), optional > > * @trysend_offchannel: see @rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(), optional > > * @poll: see @rpmsg_poll(), optional > > + * @set_flow_control: see @rpmsg_set_flow_control(), optional > > * > > * Indirection table for the operations that a rpmsg backend should implement. > > * In addition to @destroy_ept, the backend must at least implement @send and > > @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops { > > void *data, int len); > > __poll_t (*poll)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp, > > poll_table *wait); > > + int (*set_flow_control)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, bool enable); > > }; > > > > struct device *rpmsg_find_device(struct device *parent, > > diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg.h b/include/linux/rpmsg.h > > index d97dcd0..b805c70 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/rpmsg.h > > +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg.h > > @@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ struct rpmsg_device { > > }; > > > > typedef int (*rpmsg_rx_cb_t)(struct rpmsg_device *, void *, int, void *, u32); > > +typedef int (*rpmsg_rx_sig_t)(struct rpmsg_device *, void *, u32); > > > > /** > > * struct rpmsg_endpoint - binds a local rpmsg address to its user > > * @rpdev: rpmsg channel device > > * @refcount: when this drops to zero, the ept is deallocated > > * @cb: rx callback handler > > + * @sig_cb: rx serial signal handler > > * @cb_lock: must be taken before accessing/changing @cb > > * @addr: local rpmsg address > > * @priv: private data for the driver's use > > @@ -90,6 +92,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint { > > struct rpmsg_device *rpdev; > > struct kref refcount; > > rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb; > > + rpmsg_rx_sig_t sig_cb; > > struct mutex cb_lock; > > u32 addr; > > void *priv; > > @@ -104,6 +107,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint { > > * @probe: invoked when a matching rpmsg channel (i.e. device) is found > > * @remove: invoked when the rpmsg channel is removed > > * @callback: invoked when an inbound message is received on the channel > > + * @signals: invoked when a serial signal change is received on the channel > > */ > > struct rpmsg_driver { > > struct device_driver drv; > > @@ -111,6 +115,7 @@ struct rpmsg_driver { > > int (*probe)(struct rpmsg_device *dev); > > void (*remove)(struct rpmsg_device *dev); > > int (*callback)(struct rpmsg_device *, void *, int, void *, u32); > > + int (*signals)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *priv, u32); > > }; > > > > static inline u16 rpmsg16_to_cpu(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, __rpmsg16 val) > > @@ -186,6 +191,8 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst, > > __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp, > > poll_table *wait); > > > > +int rpmsg_set_flow_control(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, bool enable); > > + > > #else > > > > static inline int rpmsg_register_device(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev) > > @@ -296,6 +303,14 @@ static inline __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static inline int rpmsg_set_flow_control(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, bool enable); > > +{ > > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > > + WARN_ON(1); > > + > > + return -ENXIO; > > +} > > + > > #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG) */ > > > > /* use a macro to avoid include chaining to get THIS_MODULE */ > > -- > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > >