Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932780AbWL1JHY (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:07:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932754AbWL1JHY (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:07:24 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:1885 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932763AbWL1JHW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:07:22 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gqFvsOHVX/4Jvc+VVmUBYLSn+4McXWw9CTbw2P6paedA8/jUu0oc8LU+qwAF7TBB07/G66w2FoN7FN/YgHb8N6GDGpKCsB4mSx2/iwfrFfQ2hin6T6ykmx/1w7NvEEyx8L11ANZs1qdLY9Hk9TZ8QWDtuQHpBF7wQ9icjJ2OrAs= Message-ID: <3d57814d0612280107v11ed3b05g4433566ff7a8960f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:07:21 +1000 From: "Trent Waddington" To: "Rok Markovic" Subject: Re: Binary Drivers Cc: "James C Georgas" , LKML In-Reply-To: <45938788.4010201@kanardia.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061226112040.95091.qmail@web32614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1167139732.15424.48.camel@Rainsong> <45938788.4010201@kanardia.eu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1546 Lines: 37 On 12/28/06, Rok Markovic wrote: > Do we have a right to reverse engineer hardware, or they are protected by > patents or something similar that would prevent you from publishing results > adn/or drivers (open source). This is a pretty good resource: http://www.chillingeffects.org/reverse/faq.cgi Yes, there are probably patents covering this hardware stuff.. and that's why we have all those open source companies that have given their patents to an entity that promises to sue in retalitation if they try to use their patents against open source. So let's not worry about patents ok? They'd be screwed more than us if they try to use them. > > Are there any restrictions in how you obtain information - signal analyser, > disassembly of windows driver, etc. Not as far as I am aware. Obviously if you were to disassemble a windows driver, add a wrapper and reassemble, that would be copying.. but if you are trying to figure out how something works by reverse engineering a windows driver then that's ok. At least it is where I live (Australia) because we have laws that allow us to ignore license restrictions that say "thou shalt not reverse engineer" for most interesting purposes. Maybe you have similar laws where you live. Maybe not. Hope that helps, Trent - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/