Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754808AbWL1KoI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:44:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754813AbWL1KoH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:44:07 -0500 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([217.160.111.169]:57167 "EHLO mail.holtmann.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754808AbWL1KoG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:44:06 -0500 Subject: Re: bluetooth memory corruption (was Re: ext3-related crash in 2.6.20-rc1) From: Marcel Holtmann To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andrew Morton , kernel list , maxk@qualcomm.com, bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20061228084251.GB3955@ucw.cz> References: <20061223234305.GA1809@elf.ucw.cz> <20061223235501.GA1740@elf.ucw.cz> <1166971163.15485.21.camel@violet> <20061224234357.GA1817@elf.ucw.cz> <20061228084251.GB3955@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:40:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1167302425.2417.18.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1683 Lines: 46 Hi Pavel, > > > > > I got this nasty oops while playing with debugger. Not sure if that is > > > > > related; it also might be something with bluetooth; I already know it > > > > > corrupts memory during suspend, perhaps it corrupts memory in some > > > > > error path? > > > > > > > > Okay, I spoke too soon. bluetooth & suspend memory corruption was > > > > _way_ harder to reproduce than expected. Took me 5-or-so-suspend > > > > cycles... so it is probably unrelated to the previous crash. > > > > > > can you try to reproduce this with 2.6.20-rc2 as well. > > > > (reproduced in another mail). > > > > _urb_queue_tail(__pending_q(husb, _urb->type), _urb); > > err = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC); > > if (err) { > > BT_ERR("%s tx submit failed urb %p type %d err %d", > > husb->hdev->name, urb, _urb->type, err); > > _urb_unlink(_urb); > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Do we need to remove urb from pending_q here? > > > > _urb_queue_tail(__completed_q(husb, _urb->type), _urb); > > } else > > atomic_inc(__pending_tx(husb, _urb->type)); > > > > Any news? Should I convert above idea to a patch? Or should I make > bluetooth suspend() routine return error so corruption is impossible > to hit? to be honest, I have no idea. This code is way to ugly anyway. Regards Marcel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/