Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp2832272pxb; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys2Pii0TQLPLiKusyrtXWXnEWpjFKBv52yLM5Ni4qhoD4JUjMTpQCNs2+OIpKCWIZ2zrLc X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:71d4:: with SMTP id i20mr28508007ejk.390.1634550825745; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634550825; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HWHIo0FU85pWJQ4Ky+LUyRihWbzzHY7K2LpSRG9+3a11V3aDLYPShmSOF/XifwkxOC inuoxtWW3tJ69D07yeyI5CHFD/QccOX39uVyyk9ZFN0gA7E/0uRMIzVcJUJDFYydYpHX iUGjuWaRc4HMJE0LxOw/bkQgcPhGV7Ld4NXfFCJGic9IJ4jPVY4aiulaiok0nMqfsvQu n6fFz3u5ZVbz81vhAERJc7IoW9FdQn0LiuwMc0HAYXwlth24jExtFC9ArJtLHyUqyDcT M320C+kmQaCmfBJNW/qzERYjcf592K9H9ZOiXRx9E2dDFV/dBCMqU1Pa262inP+irPu7 WwFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=54V1KnQoB6CDT102wu6F0M83i4Ai4wrcXeBm3THLwu4=; b=T72LwQgBsqsdY9BDkhJ68klspuHy89tYm7pwL1rfesg8uI+DQxBN+07qIpMIpBAyn5 6LSXAYfAFH3yDzlBkGSZT4x7RAh0pwJRS38Y3lmlL/GOwkq8rSLwLOfQtrrUj1zduSkf 6Pmcpyr/YMrCYLJSSKsGQeSWilPUf0tsKRAj5nXwAWAI7B2HlNFpJVMyX19xTPKRrQbO wxYDWPIuBl/bY5XtrkjeF1Hlo5P1gzKLQxlieowK8FKQr4p8EtxynNDGYvM3lNtpH4RT Svwa0tPS+P9dq1Ct2Hz0bSDDBVNhDI5iIGvPvp9mJYUTRG8rDZv5TTSI+qJ2oS0M9awF uc0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=aj+6l2L+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nd25si26732052ejc.391.2021.10.18.02.53.22; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=aj+6l2L+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231565AbhJRJvQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:51:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231521AbhJRJvP (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:51:15 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D7AC06161C; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 02:49:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=54V1KnQoB6CDT102wu6F0M83i4Ai4wrcXeBm3THLwu4=; b=aj+6l2L+bEScCV3CfEXP+uvaMu jErIR9Py+fscLbiqDt5e048vdPHkQuepfbpyy8PD9OEYEjBzipbDqwdWyscNUauhnhvZCSmo9hsBF akIbMNiUHz/DRDjr6g+Fgb/DbLxT7xBg4u1LbI63SOZB5YYk6DYceJvRIQlwzXId9F6aE3c8kN9mm 36j4f9+VFNeI6ejRAngTrZNsObQF2gp1qu7KyRWlyDHiB0yuYCngFKZUTy1/Ly9ET6BbJCfQhfZ+E zn9mOvu6rvSJWgIJCgjI1/vZYsHJOcsn49S8jHVKn/L2DdGOzdJglzpYDC9EFU+n3Ry8rVjD66Ax4 Ev5FQh0g==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mcPFo-00AWdP-Fu; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:48:24 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5BDF300242; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B17B62013A69E; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:48:22 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Kajol Jain , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, songliubraving@fb.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add mem_hops field in perf_mem_data_src structure Message-ID: References: <20211006140654.298352-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <20211007064933.GK174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87pms3c7w5.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pms3c7w5.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:46:18PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 07:36:50PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: > > > >> Kajol Jain (4): > >> perf: Add comment about current state of PERF_MEM_LVL_* namespace and > >> remove an extra line > >> perf: Add mem_hops field in perf_mem_data_src structure > >> tools/perf: Add mem_hops field in perf_mem_data_src structure > >> powerpc/perf: Fix data source encodings for L2.1 and L3.1 accesses > >> > >> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- > >> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 2 ++ > >> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > >> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > >> tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > >> 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > > > > How do we want this routed? Shall I take it, or does Michael want it in > > the Power tree? > > It's mostly non-powerpc, so I think you should take it. > > There's a slim chance we could end up with a conflict in the powerpc > part, but that's no big deal. Sure thing, into perf/core it goes. Thanks!