Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp3073377pxb; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7aeYO9gCDSmbP7nz1pIViQpFA/9HoSORyrH0S+cwFlpgIIUybdfRGhNU5GwBu51ZrBMHX X-Received: by 2002:a63:e613:: with SMTP id g19mr24550733pgh.12.1634568284280; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634568284; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aEcYvvJ3gFR1aenYjirPHVFKF3WzS+eNg/UoyghWXqVtCLhA4maM5aDtXctVAb14D6 sP6GRohspjr2idlFljmH1iDB62WjbbUkf+C79TSwL+xgYVJq/pUmAdzRIC1ROexsbh3/ 14OAN2Nx5PgZyxM+dah0SnJO+OV7b5Qoa9N9KeeuPGg9y7Y9kLhhQoFXdBJ/gwS88p8e tN+dybAnAW2BOg1iffRKpcrw01/3qqK4uHVecfXjTjZh/wjnmnkvvJxUmfedylfoE4DY xMc2U7nAUcMvwgWfJ5UXmW2U9pDmJIdWbcH26WN/AdIeM1FTZI0lnpxKgxJebseJ5TN2 rFbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=JfVkZNzNuiBYeLqNM2vQVGMxFQsXx2EtHWeWV+pMscY=; b=L6C01hxpU/BY+EeNd7zmecHMJU/Ho3VRsBx24VMZSJ8SfZxybeVVWhKmeYf6nlsaiN nn1hfDda2/3G1rGNUlDh1slGRK44odp+bqYHup0EN9go4UmlZhmq3hIncTvG1NgpFXPF pqpZI96qtQEgSL3YrqofpBTyvA1ZRcEfPwDHlVaH+i6jJOgDcoBBEvvGJWEFQx/jrOgg L3y7pE/27qEcUxF3B8NpGDxZ5e3AZsCjCMBF0b+1wPTG84O7malIeydVGhJ0QpDbTdRr wPOgwJIkqbDtmevwPnMGn3pXCEQsX6MUiwVn3c6VwCmFfnlCxWfTLjdwCazhtQaHLS55 5Qhw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d9si24607022plg.284.2021.10.18.07.44.23; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232288AbhJROpO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:45:14 -0400 Received: from brightrain.aerifal.cx ([216.12.86.13]:54970 "EHLO brightrain.aerifal.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232272AbhJROpM (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:45:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:43:00 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Arnd Bergmann , musl@lists.openwall.com, Michael Forney , ALSA Development Mailing List , Takashi Iwai , Baolin Wang , y2038 Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mark Brown , Baolin Wang Subject: Re: [musl] Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 8/9] ALSA: add new 32-bit layout for snd_pcm_mmap_status/control Message-ID: <20211018144259.GK7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20211007160634.GB7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20211007165158.GC7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20211008120736.GF7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 09:53:38AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 14:07:39 +0200, > Rich Felker wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 01:11:34PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 11:24:39 +0200, > > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 10:43 AM Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 18:51:58 +0200, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > > > > @@ -557,11 +558,15 @@ struct __snd_pcm_sync_ptr { > > > > > #if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN : defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) > > > > > typedef char __pad_before_uframe[sizeof(__u64) - sizeof(snd_pcm_uframes_t)]; > > > > > typedef char __pad_after_uframe[0]; > > > > > +typedef char __pad_before_u32[4]; > > > > > +typedef char __pad_after_u32[0]; > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > > > #if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN : defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) > > > > > typedef char __pad_before_uframe[0]; > > > > > typedef char __pad_after_uframe[sizeof(__u64) - sizeof(snd_pcm_uframes_t)]; > > > > > +typedef char __pad_before_u32[0]; > > > > > +typedef char __pad_after_u32[4]; > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > I think these should remain unchanged, the complex expression was intentionally > > > > done so the structures are laid out the same way on 64-bit > > > > architectures, so that > > > > the kernel can use the __SND_STRUCT_TIME64 path internally on both 32-bit > > > > and 64-bit architectures. > > > > > > That was explicitly defined, but OK, this isn't necessarily defined > > > here. > > > > > > > > @@ -2970,8 +2981,17 @@ static int snd_pcm_sync_ptr(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, > > > > > memset(&sync_ptr, 0, sizeof(sync_ptr)); > > > > > if (get_user(sync_ptr.flags, (unsigned __user *)&(_sync_ptr->flags))) > > > > > return -EFAULT; > > > > > - if (copy_from_user(&sync_ptr.c.control, &(_sync_ptr->c.control), sizeof(struct snd_pcm_mmap_control))) > > > > > - return -EFAULT; > > > > > + if (buggy_control) { > > > > > + if (copy_from_user(&sync_ptr.c.control_api_2_0_15, > > > > > + &(_sync_ptr->c.control_api_2_0_15), > > > > > + sizeof(sync_ptr.c.control_api_2_0_15))) > > > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > > + } else { > > > > > + if (copy_from_user(&sync_ptr.c.control, > > > > > + &(_sync_ptr->c.control), > > > > > + sizeof(sync_ptr.c.control))) > > > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > The problem I see with this is that it might break musl's ability to > > > > emulate the new > > > > interface on top of the old (time32) one for linux-4.x and older > > > > kernels, as the conversion > > > > function is no longer stateless but has to know the negotiated > > > > interface version. > > > > > > > > It's probably fine as long as we can be sure that the 2.0.16+ API > > > > version only gets > > > > negotiated if both the kernel and user sides support it, and musl only emulates > > > > the 2.0.15 API version from the current kernels. > > > > > > > > I've tried to understand this part of musl's convert_ioctl_struct(), but I just > > > > can't figure out whether it does the conversion based the on the layout that > > > > is currently used in the kernel, or based on the layout we should have been > > > > using, and would use with the above fix. Rich, can you help me here? > > > > > > So, at this moment, I'm not sure whether we should correct the struct > > > at all. This will lead to yet more breakage, and basically the struct > > > itself *works* -- the only bug is in 32bit compat handling in the > > > kernel (again). > > > > > > The below is a revised kernel patch (again untested), just correcting > > > the behavior of 32bit compat mode. 32bit apps on 32bit kernel work > > > fine as is, as well as 64bit apps on 64bit kernel. > > > > I'm perfectly okay with this if Arnd is! It's probably the least > > invasive and has the least long-term maintenance cost and fallout on > > other projects. > > OK, I'll submit a proper patch now, to be included in the next PR for > 5.15-rc. For further fixes, let's think carefully. Am I correct in my understanding that the fix of keeping the "broken" definition (and having the 64-bit kernel honor it for 32-bit binaries) has been accepted? Since musl's translation for pre-time64 kernels seems to have been using the "non-broken" definition, I think completing the fix requires a change in musl too. Rich