Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754972AbWL1Uq6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:46:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754971AbWL1Uq6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:46:58 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:58771 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753748AbWL1Uq5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:46:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:46:44 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Tim Schmielau Cc: lkml , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h Message-Id: <20061228124644.4e1ed32b.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 649 Lines: 16 On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:27:40 +0100 (CET) Tim Schmielau wrote: > After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in > module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous > sched.h includes. Why are they "superfluous"? Because those compilation units pick up sched.h indirectly, via other includes? If so, is that a thing we want to do? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/