Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754981AbWL1U6T (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:58:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754982AbWL1U6T (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:58:19 -0500 Received: from [139.30.44.16] ([139.30.44.16]:15023 "EHLO gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754980AbWL1U6S (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:58:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:58:17 +0100 (CET) From: Tim Schmielau To: Andrew Morton cc: lkml , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h In-Reply-To: <20061228124644.4e1ed32b.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20061228124644.4e1ed32b.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 24 On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:27:40 +0100 (CET) > Tim Schmielau wrote: > > > After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in > > module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous > > sched.h includes. > > Why are they "superfluous"? Because those compilation > units pick up sched.h indirectly, via other includes? > > If so, is that a thing we want to do? No, there is nothing at all in these files that needs sched.h. I suppose the includes are left over from times when more unrelated macros lived in sched.h (fortunately much of that cruft got cleand up already). Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/