Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211016072351.237745-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> <20211016072351.237745-3-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211016072351.237745-3-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:38:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSyFrEV5c9Z+aMU+WL3zi88A7ZJft-ic6cUH0mpXEzkxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next,v3 2/2] audit: return early if the rule has a lower priority
To:     Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
Cc:     Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, rgb@redhat.com,
        linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        wangweiyang2@huawei.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:21 AM Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> It is not necessary for audit_filter_rules() functions to check
> audit fileds of the rule with a lower priority, and if we did,
> there might be some unintended effects, such as the ctx->ppid
> may be changed unexpectedly, so return early if the rule has
> a lower priority.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/auditsc.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Merged to audit/next, thanks!

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com