Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755014AbWL2BgJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:36:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755016AbWL2BgJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:36:09 -0500 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:48264 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755014AbWL2BgI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:36:08 -0500 Message-Id: <200612290136.kBT1a2sO006708@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> To: Adrian Bunk cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions In-Reply-To: Message from Adrian Bunk of "Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:39:09 BST." <20061228223909.GK20714@stusta.de> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.5 (beta27) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:02 -0300 From: "Horst H. von Brand" X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:35:17 by milter-greylist-3.0 (inti.inf.utfsm.cl [200.1.19.1]); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:06 -0300 (CLST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 17 Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19. Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and 2.6.19.1 work fine, before 2.6.20-rc1 it broke. I checked the initrds for both versions, the only difference "diff -Nur" finds between the unpacked initrds are the modules themselves (obviously). -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/