Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20061228.205106.130845178.davem@davemloft.net>
To: vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Cc: bunk@stusta.de, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions 
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <200612290136.kBT1a2sO006708@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl>
References: <bunk@stusta.de>
	<200612290136.kBT1a2sO006708@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 968
Lines: 22

From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:02 -0300

> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
> 
> Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and
> 2.6.19.1 work fine, before 2.6.20-rc1 it broke. I checked the initrds for
> both versions, the only difference "diff -Nur" finds between the unpacked
> initrds are the modules themselves (obviously).

Did you report this will all relevant details on sparclinux@vger
so that the sparc64 maintainers can analyze the problem?

I didn't see the report there else I would be looking into it.

Please don't report sparc64 bugs here, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/