Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp596235pxb; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4MCAe8J4ku7ZiI/BvawgS8owJeEhocOZI7JH0BXWi54VdXyYxi+HU7yng3tI5hryNQqOo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9a07:: with SMTP id ai7mr39718695ejc.55.1634659479501; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634659479; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KZAnsHtEYfzRX+zFPaPakqhU9Yu1Fo0HmYbeNUliyRuY5k73+WejXzAs7aY5igR2IW WueQk/wh0YGyfFj74RJ2sfQumUb67mADgxQrNAD1Rbwrw3IpvzgIjO4Nwai395w4rRSM O5Ep3OTb0DUM7onSgAv4n/4EapVI6c4YMaO/K300FRVKyHv6HQ93cG1/JSIlw33szYIX PJvTJxGqEg9yFhYg6Dm3KV++FvTx6NpAliLGxyxYbLUSV+wMAi+LWYgmiyCf8PJg0pE4 PIIO6pjixCOdctStTVJlhC+GsjdUQrqTvvf23lkj3BFE1t6k2LadYVTln8Q5ekGwdWxY kRkw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=+/pkobYQmFSVPtB7/1zAAgkGIOuOGumz0nqsWSm3uLo=; b=qMAMLUMVy1yVxkyY9MbldCqnBLHwWME0quKAPVifdZcZikt1sZvfvtwTeHPW0kNFDM YD+TG+2VtZL79pt5/5y8VtQpoVSTwidIkdaMd9GVyPJPwxmfPiI4uxgPq/nyToitSco2 JfOJvMKcYGd063m1xQle8uOjYwSnSHAoe9PsPyIbzmNTR6HqIzBaMVTzVumiL2z2MurH rU6JVj43sii30h1hyPbS44mKaQzUscbAs2vd1VP5wlRUagLksUmot9hqK8T+VbCHiBRg wnUFN229uTbTDF0Z5xz62gr81ArCONPsktiRtdx1Cg9bC7PtRcDL+a/kM2/WdKU/rSR9 yOmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=jMplC40v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kz1si26756519ejc.7.2021.10.19.09.04.11; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=jMplC40v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233552AbhJSQDE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:03:04 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:34973 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229774AbhJSQDD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:03:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634659250; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+/pkobYQmFSVPtB7/1zAAgkGIOuOGumz0nqsWSm3uLo=; b=jMplC40vZdm6TXltESiaZ20NdkurOHXwrnhG/taNv3uoHC/443cUy69orPDxPL3yanotWZ hZeRJ4JH0BFvtXf6bCizxJx8kd+kQBJDacfWJrN0LkBKQNc/558udtiMcuK+xHZR3Ufwd4 9wXUSsy+A96QkuLENbdKvsBLCG/5ZPs= Received: from mail-io1-f69.google.com (mail-io1-f69.google.com [209.85.166.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-569-yhLOpEQdMsWjLFUlMwwobQ-1; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:00:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yhLOpEQdMsWjLFUlMwwobQ-1 Received: by mail-io1-f69.google.com with SMTP id z18-20020a6b5c12000000b005dccad62545so13669178ioh.17 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:00:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+/pkobYQmFSVPtB7/1zAAgkGIOuOGumz0nqsWSm3uLo=; b=l//Cv8DoCe2J6pFGEdWVYbRIukyNTdnBksY3NGp5MreTTzTGTS2JZqzNJvNfTaCZpT kDde+BCBrJycioK4j1YlpL5g6bQ8C97OTaYmdKG0OLrtLMs9SfVhqTvgiTknBGsSrm5u mnAWI34UxTMYPomSznY1/ByKWOJtGMKIJqhf/nENDhpaNceIXGWMNWl/qfqFu/fvKFAl Z+YChXZDuTTTAzO5aNXZp/gTML5r1VpPtYc3AQgKA9urXpkAWKrPwhnNVUXxyFLyDyTO rq/sopDOwexqxu4Xrk/H728VT5M3rx7emd2Ud2S7PaVVJXOsj6PExofkwgLbpUCSsOX7 R3Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HReUB80GzcZYIC6EDC0YFExXhy8VgjXGkQYQYtuYcnODLXKTp Bk8FDVZfaGNlTb5KwSERWuQt6QgkWnToE9a5bjfmeUg9J6TG+shE4cYB/UeS6QCa7dQ+69FBbt2 EzV6PgMO3M7JZWKoA5J4sd3U7 X-Received: by 2002:a92:ad07:: with SMTP id w7mr964692ilh.162.1634659248221; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:00:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a92:ad07:: with SMTP id w7mr964668ilh.162.1634659248043; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.0.19] ([205.214.171.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm9324101ila.32.2021.10.19.09.00.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:00:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Torvalds , Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: Catalin Marinas , Paul Mackerras , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , cluster-devel , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs References: <20211019134204.3382645-1-agruenba@redhat.com> From: Bob Peterson In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/19/21 10:40 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:42 AM Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> >> From my point of view, the following questions remain: >> >> * I hope these patches will be merged for v5.16, but what process >> should I follow for that? The patch queue contains mm and iomap >> changes, so a pull request from the gfs2 tree would be unusual. > > Oh, I'd much rather get these as one pull request from the author and > from the person that actually ended up testing this. Hi Linus, FWIW, I've been working with Andreas on this and have tested it quite extensively, although only with gfs2. I've tested it with numerous scenarios, both stand-alone (xfstests as well as several other test programs I have in my collection) and in a cluster with some very heavy duty cluster coherency tests. My testing is nearly complete, but not quite. Regards, Bob Peterson GFS2 File System