Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1215407pxb; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:06:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp9rICB4R6VEdxACqe2PijEoMfgQtRgmQMaqTKFtyc90eg1aKddUVwHlAHC17C+zIS4gAW X-Received: by 2002:a63:ff11:: with SMTP id k17mr32176275pgi.405.1634713601527; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:06:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634713601; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yt77+ttZs6JmdQ9oa/PKBrVgYS0KpN1MrzkKxARbZpPFUhazfa7mMUMR4/J51BoXNa mqw51AVfhmN96t+Cp538ZJ3s9XHuxgn0CKIG312tCiCEpujoOb2/STKVONaQNL0JELx3 2jd7eCpws0qKF4QPezeZfNuKEXRjTsBrlsYG8Ec4+bm/uERWr/Q1g4+sx+ksAxd+I0m8 f5lYrP3KSM+z7CdQXT1jXNxAXpm9KI5eanad0xJ6guEUh7L8NwVZCdwdCNLZLNcrIeTB pYUi5fwkQ8InXNywZiwjqa9qor521UDJZ0Vng4uxb0rLeksaeCqnTjRjsi7obLeK5HsM g51w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=/2NsxnLIDw3Ym2HwbyCoUHONDwrJHwQ4itSGvldx+Qo=; b=EdWU5otAs5PloWIeEYQWRxzgmH1PMBKCATL8p1bHT+Y/oRydYF78mYXbzx9W8OFaig USB3jXiJNUYmOgNpfCMEs0qqoWs6AV9EqVAV/wQEi+lyhvftzWcxcz/Rqd4KMaSswYwB 4Mt8+1IZGQVYJs+GsFTTmbAGFmPNR2KKoP5Ij6PADN1LBmfeyryaiR4DHa5eWPPAGVni kphdvLBU/75d/ta4JLp8oDr5Pa8bkg2n5iU5IYF4a7pZKIZzJlEdNNVj0KOM1klt1sQZ L0cfT9elOn9VfXjnf0NIk/hCzrv4M2lA+QVdX9dJetFJhv1PNPtOej7NbUukrB+FReok DmEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p2si1879165pfe.161.2021.10.20.00.06.29; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229842AbhJTHHI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 03:07:08 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:61598 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229741AbhJTHHH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 03:07:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10142"; a="226171625" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,166,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="226171625" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Oct 2021 00:04:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,166,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="483605079" Received: from dengjie-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.154.68]) ([10.239.154.68]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2021 00:04:46 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Greg KH , Wolfram Sang , Vincent Whitchurch , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@axis.com References: <20211019074647.19061-2-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> <20211019080913.oajrvr2msz5enzvz@vireshk-i7> <20211019094203.3kjzch7ipbdv7peg@vireshk-i7> <20211019143748.wrpqopj2hmpvblh4@vireshk-i7> <94aa39ab-4ed6-daee-0402-f58bfed0cadd@intel.com> <8e182ea8-5016-fa78-3d77-eefba7d58612@intel.com> <20211020064128.y2bjsbdmpojn7pjo@vireshk-i7> From: Jie Deng Message-ID: <01d9c992-28cc-6644-1e82-929fc46f91b4@intel.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:04:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211020064128.y2bjsbdmpojn7pjo@vireshk-i7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/10/20 14:41, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20-10-21, 14:35, Jie Deng wrote: >> Yes, but we need to know what's the best value to be configured for a >> specific "other side". >> >> I think the "other side" should be more aware of what value is reasonable to >> be used. > If we _really_ need that, then it would require an update to the > specification first. > > I am not sure if the other side is the only party in play here. It > depends on the entire setup and not just the hardware device. > Specially with virtualisation things become really slow because of > context switches, etc. It may be better for the guest userspace to > decide on the value. > > Since this is specially for virtualisation, the kernel may set the > value to few HZ by default, lets say 10 (Yeah its really high) :). I'm OK with this way for the simplicity.