Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:46:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:46:07 -0500 Received: from [212.65.238.182] ([212.65.238.182]:46855 "EHLO trebo3.chemoprojekt.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:46:02 -0500 Message-ID: <35E64A70B5ACD511BCB0000000004CA1095D08@NT_CHEMO> From: PVotruba@Chemoprojekt.cz To: joelbeach@optushome.com.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Maximum (efficient) partition sizes for various filesystem ty pes... Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:02:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hmm it looks like that Debians want's to avoid user impatience during excessive e2fsck job at startup. But technically, one can hardly expect problems - if there were any, they surely appeared already in this list :) Compared to *some* other OSes, linux makes fs checking after certain number of rw mounts. When thinks like that happen, some less enlightened users tend to be "derailed", because they don't expect that. :) Regards, Petr > -----P?vodn? zpr?va----- > Od: Joel Beach [SMTP:joelbeach@optushome.com.au] > Odesl?no: 19. listopadu 2001 11:23 > Komu: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > P?edm?t: Re: Maximum (efficient) partition sizes for various > filesystem types... > > I think I'll fix up that bit in the Debian manual myself then if they let > me.... > > For what it's worth, here's the paragraph from the "Woody" installation > manual: > > "For new users, personal Debian boxes, home systems, and other single-user > setups, a single / partition (plus swap) is probably the easiest, simplest > way to go. It is possible to have problems with this idea, though, with > larger (20GB) disks. Based on limitations in how ext2 works, avoid any > single partition greater than 6GB or so." > > Joel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Cox" > To: "Joel Beach" > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:58 PM > Subject: Re: Maximum (efficient) partition sizes for various filesystem > types... > > > > > For instance, the Debian guide says that, due to Ext2 efficiency, > partitions > > > greater than 6-7GB shouldn't be created. Is this true for > Ext3/ReiserFS. > > > > I've run several 45-200Gb ext2 and ext3 partitions with no problem. I'm > not > > sure what the origin of the Debian guide comemnt is but I've never heard > > it from an ext2 developer > > > > Obviously pick a journalled fs for big partitions 8) > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/