Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030274AbWL3Emx (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:42:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030275AbWL3Emx (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:42:53 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:45434 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030274AbWL3Emw (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:42:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:42:47 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Print sysrq-m messages with KERN_INFO priority Message-Id: <20061229204247.be66c972.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 570 Lines: 15 On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:24:53 -0500 "Theodore Ts'o" wrote: > Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the > default KERN_WARNING priority hm, I wonder why. If someone does sysrq- then they presumably want to display the result? Tricky. Is this patch a consistency thing? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/