Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1644726pxb; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:03:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQ3iCwEUrXXyd9op16oUNb9soMzoLbe9SUiO4XzG+l/I7uvyLhjnsrUVsfw3xB6v96/pgb X-Received: by 2002:a63:7102:: with SMTP id m2mr132134pgc.100.1634745817800; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634745817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jEbmb5DezzK9vvjfBisxxopwDkOTFig3i84OI1HdR2ycsYmlhyVu5wBn9q0wTrIoYI sDEU0CccMss2lLEaZ2P8NSMBz6BPddsXMhV0OZbn5koxxEBDhueuwQjb3I9WT/HUbeqC anVPz9pH2uRkFf0x+v7NXwyrWTCBhIeDmBHjC0ETeonsL3j+IeSGq97biRJcCQh+vSEp LOX0330ieqGYYOYLkspXmiURjZD64P4OvT6e0Q/nccglXYNbUe0XogNd2zOm6P8WAuaM i29sDOKAzBl9Gf16Z+/xUPMx0OAPv4oF4kRDi2MwRmQGmG9NIzOR+J6jTaUHo57BgirM E0Pw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=kgVg8XOUlQOQfaXgZOrUDNgny97RKhvWyEABz4wQ/M4=; b=kpD26NuKz9+KypVF+lKjyHUAp9brSWPnQGk/JmTDCiVFtz1mSrk2mFs82Gl5X0nmha kybQjzd4ecdHIr8E29zN8j7kGk7mwB7bF44lWGXWPG22x0wP+DuYZSYMH/Y5cEJqfsr+ fhAOy9u7AIpADutWQX9n75GM4Glx8Jt1L6zYrNwIG7AaskHPCFWNcdTWVu5JfuNL3Kwv M7XCzlTC6VIP5CFm0Lf2HiwnlBIAy9LfY+YI9zCelqSTd7/0mfAytLxETgUN9pD+Yw7n Tj3kbdjfSkasOu7TdCStTBiwiVFu/JiM+gN4pznlL26Z0d+RZ9MNw2TTTBgOasvjM9Ez wVkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q12si4285258plx.447.2021.10.20.09.03.20; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229952AbhJTQD7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:03:59 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:52932 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230510AbhJTQD5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:03:57 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:40844) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mdE28-002QTs-V7; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:01:40 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:42706 helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mdE27-000qtw-Tc; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:01:40 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Yu Zhao , Alexey Gladkov References: <20211020144651.10321529@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:00:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20211020144651.10321529@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:46:51 +1100") Message-ID: <875ytrptyp.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mdE27-000qtw-Tc;;;mid=<875ytrptyp.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+nFg8WEoM2KyuoGiFCYzJt/cSk6/DICqw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4987] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Stephen Rothwell X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 402 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (2.6%), b_tie_ro: 9 (2.3%), parse: 0.75 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 10 (2.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.11 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.5 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.09 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.83 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 144 (35.9%), check_bayes: 143 (35.5%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.4%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 1.59 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 126 (31.4%), b_finish: 0.88 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 217 (54.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.47 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.4 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 1.74 (0.4%), tests_pri_10: 1.74 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 9 (2.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:84, > from include/linux/bug.h:5, > from arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:15, > from arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:63, > from include/linux/irqflags.h:16, > from include/linux/rcupdate.h:26, > from include/linux/rculist.h:11, > from include/linux/pid.h:5, > from include/linux/sched.h:14, > from security/keys/process_keys.c:9: > security/keys/process_keys.c: In function 'key_change_session_keyring': > security/keys/process_keys.c:923:16: error: format '%s' expects a matching 'char *' argument [-Werror=format=] > 923 | WARN_ONCE(1, "In %s get_ucounts failed\n"); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/asm-generic/bug.h:99:17: note: in definition of macro '__WARN_printf' > 99 | __warn_printk(arg); \ > | ^~~ > include/linux/once_lite.h:19:4: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN' > 19 | func(__VA_ARGS__); \ > | ^~~~ > include/asm-generic/bug.h:150:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DO_ONCE_LITE_IF' > 150 | DO_ONCE_LITE_IF(condition, WARN, 1, format) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > security/keys/process_keys.c:923:3: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ONCE' > 923 | WARN_ONCE(1, "In %s get_ucounts failed\n"); > | ^~~~~~~~~ > security/keys/process_keys.c:923:21: note: format string is defined here > 923 | WARN_ONCE(1, "In %s get_ucounts failed\n"); > | ~^ > | | > | char * > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > Caused by commit > > 346b5b4aa656 ("ucounts: Move get_ucounts from cred_alloc_blank to key_change_session_keyring") > > I have used the userns tree from next-20211019 for today. Thank you very much for catching that. I am now quite embarrassed I did not catch that myself. Eric