Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1724918pxb; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:29:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhuWdIEJXO1+zSLJuHEaefcehLLdyFvOuj7zqmAB5V+UkD163TNYTix5oCTHcVVQytYZfO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1950:b0:44d:9402:3396 with SMTP id s16-20020a056a00195000b0044d94023396mr616580pfk.70.1634750942037; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:29:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634750942; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nPFjgmE0hlKr2mQM/4gqHLoN+CcuEjI2M66YNnS8+r0+x1ZHwzPoEbMkrR5cKhXvfk aJjRgJajlUddPSLQ2GLvRO5S3DDW5SxKt59UeztvqBdXwL28DJJSm6yZKIUDJBS65OVR AI1A+fyipXqrhdKvGi0pKBfUSlarZfztX85K0Co3tWcSrgH3ExibbZ3LaI390/mquskH JEKtJmq3bCt/0mnUUsLUgua/bivn1d0N/fQEYmx2zHV2FLfUIl8Wg8yeBR7u4n3iRmLx fyhTv17TnVJ+HUsjZuFFrKFJtIMZRnqReRtB0GJSPvr9oj7/sRrhcIXftbU9bm1b+Rxj 6HHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=lR95r34HTA8n+dlsQXDXTyICRzOOISq4gYn1cMNZEhk=; b=y8g3QwBiU2rWc4Y1hIifJ8Ahbw1y9XCf+0sh/J16cTiRq6plgNIx4UEGl+YbMXMk0C hLISFl6XP0moMn1F344m+cRZBCgi6N3sq6F0F2cAdiggf8HjeLTiL6exIXhGz7tYpJbY 3qLDb13EvAsEz1eAAjSX5/rSX0TCvkon20r2clKpw2tc+Viznd9Ap5w/prMwY0fyzf2I B60vbwr+0EUDg+4sFC2+QcnISGU+onCm5/dtc4Mb6ZtQXn+DwSS0cwLbqSG2GuThRnH/ TdMe01a4noUKqenyrtpyviDHns+oj5kNQJr9qPIr2HIfXQ9vlzVR+eszkpzGqzKIAGo5 DXCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Up0kIspo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k4si5063503plk.60.2021.10.20.10.28.48; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Up0kIspo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230196AbhJTRaA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:30:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36560 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230179AbhJTR3y (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:29:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F4D4C06161C for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id gn3so3008631pjb.0 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:27:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lR95r34HTA8n+dlsQXDXTyICRzOOISq4gYn1cMNZEhk=; b=Up0kIspodSM80DPjfRd9xf+cW5H83gxrW2VP+pmMvO6aSla9svloCnWHzAzAMNS0J+ nwrApzu+tcwkVmMO8pf/BXKnh7apC8IDXwiik2n3hX/d5fvWOSSbbvMntNYzEn23SIpn Mmxxel4FJqpJ5ofbKOwArCt9jgkMa0/ECG61qoskDd4fi0cS5hN0ORvOlOrLnjewwMlW d41leNBaqiDGRNylNB2G5DqY/WyD4wptu2R9uAQjJ6ah22BjIEN7rRlFTrFrRoq5Wb+R sN2nAzK7jSM88rhc3vXTja3JW5MoLIIV0YaWOZG8X6LugbaFzH5/VkIVaRsUDt69yjXm YeVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lR95r34HTA8n+dlsQXDXTyICRzOOISq4gYn1cMNZEhk=; b=db4LrR2JkPwdb8ahNYzwdeK5ixmHtFA4fHvFcv1+x9T5QrHVx8iJU42uXYxI2Dis2/ DV5FefgcsihmsqIsQ+u3+8hwEHAtAjsw//pat1i+w8+/uoxdGXwJqczg/pom60PMk+Zi nwGOnpYDaFNTFENYi9u3siJ9ImyTpz9y/pEuClvJxIVrRrXBzU02RNo3matUXq5pk+pI bDwcAGQikao9CierHqQ6GyJHLn4gCpc0AJCDkgDcVHJ7nEZRMT+32W3no/lbl+fD8Btl MGXSE6tPNVtmgP9ZvjzKzNTnM5ecxjCTr/NqJFaRQzEBYcia8j7YgybCN04i2TgKrEjM ipng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xk629sSgExb7CvsGisYQ6AQtDlYjv6sYD8x9bPvAHa/qlPbFW gk5UN0FlYSE6VVnw2QxPeGhxbg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c47:: with SMTP id np7mr267018pjb.22.1634750859525; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm6464002pjm.36.2021.10.20.10.27.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:27:36 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Ohad Ben-Cohen , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Rob Herring , Christoph Hellwig , Stefano Stabellini , Bruce Ashfield Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] remoteproc: Instantiate the new remoteproc virtio platform device Message-ID: <20211020172736.GC3340362@p14s> References: <20211001101234.4247-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20211001101234.4247-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211001101234.4247-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Good morning, On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:12:34PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > Migrate from the rvdev device to the rvdev platform device. > From this patch, when a vdev resource is found in the resource table > the remoteproc core register a platform device. > > All reference to the rvdev->dev has been updated to rvdev-pdev->dev > > The use of kref counter is replaced by get/put_device on the remoteproc > virtio device. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 49 +++++++------ > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 16 ---- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 93 ++++++------------------ > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 - > 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 67ccd088db8f..d9256db8b130 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > { > struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr; > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > + struct rproc_vdev_data vdev_data; > + struct platform_device *pdev; > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; > int i, ret; > > @@ -486,28 +488,34 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > dev_dbg(dev, "vdev rsc: id %d, dfeatures 0x%x, cfg len %d, %d vrings\n", > rsc->id, rsc->dfeatures, rsc->config_len, rsc->num_of_vrings); > > - /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ > - if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) { > - dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + /* platform data of the new rvdev platform */ This comment is very confusing... Shouldn't it be "rvdev device" instead? > + vdev_data.rsc_offset = offset; > + vdev_data.id = rsc->id; > + vdev_data.index = rproc->nb_vdev; > > - rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rvdev) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - kref_init(&rvdev->refcount); > - > - rvdev->id = rsc->id; > - rvdev->rproc = rproc; > - rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev; > + pdev = rproc_virtio_register_device(rproc, &vdev_data); > + if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) { > + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, > + "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev); > + } > > - ret = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rvdev); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > + /* If we made it to this point the remote proc virtio platform at been probed */ This too is just as confusing. I have to guess you are referring to rproc_virtio_probe(). All that guessing is very time consuming and makes reviewing this work quite difficult. I will review this set one more time but from an overall perspective I think it is holding together. That said I would like to see what other people think, especially Christoph. More comments to come... Thanks, Mathieu > + rvdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + if (WARN_ON(!rvdev)) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto free_rvdev; > + } > > rproc->nb_vdev++; > > + /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ > + if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) { > + dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto free_rvdev; > + } > + > /* parse the vrings */ > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { > ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i); > @@ -515,9 +523,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > goto free_rvdev; > } > > - /* remember the resource offset*/ > - rvdev->rsc_offset = offset; > - > /* allocate the vring resources */ > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { > ret = rproc_alloc_vring(rvdev, i); > @@ -531,7 +536,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > for (i--; i >= 0; i--) > rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]); > free_rvdev: > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > + rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev); > return ret; > } > > @@ -1270,7 +1275,7 @@ void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc) > > /* clean up remote vdev entries */ > list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) > - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); > + rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev); > > rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc); > } > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > index 0bb1b14e5136..2f68e7380c77 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > @@ -38,12 +38,10 @@ int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, > /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_VIRTIO) > > -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev); > struct platform_device * > rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *vdev_data); > void rproc_virtio_unregister_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev); > irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); > > #else > > @@ -59,14 +57,6 @@ static inline void rproc_virtio_unregister_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > WARN_ON(1); > } > > -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > -{ > - /* This shouldn't be possible */ > - WARN_ON(1); > - > - return -ENXIO; > -} > - > static inline irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id) > { > /* This shouldn't be possible */ > @@ -75,12 +65,6 @@ static inline irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id) > return IRQ_NONE; > } > > -static inline void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > -{ > - /* This shouldn't be possible */ > - WARN_ON(1); > -} > - > #endif > > /* from remoteproc_debugfs.c */ > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > index 7188fb8ce40f..34781a2136e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > @@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ > > static struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > - return container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct rproc_vdev, dev); > + struct platform_device *pdev; > + > + pdev = container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct platform_device, dev); > + > + return platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > } > > static struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct virtio_device *vdev) > @@ -343,13 +347,10 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) > { > struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev); > - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); > > kfree(vdev); > > - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); > - > - put_device(&rproc->dev); > + put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev); > } > > /** > @@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) > static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) > { > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev; > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > struct virtio_device *vdev; > struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > int ret; > @@ -436,17 +437,15 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) > vdev->dev.release = rproc_virtio_dev_release; > > /* > - * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer > + * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rvdev pointer > * here, because drivers probed with this vdev will indirectly > * access the wrapping rproc. > * > - * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement > + * Therefore we must increment the rvdev refcount here, and decrement > * it _only_ when the vdev is released. > */ > - get_device(&rproc->dev); > + get_device(dev); > > - /* Reference the vdev and vring allocations */ > - kref_get(&rvdev->refcount); > > ret = register_virtio_device(vdev); > if (ret) { > @@ -488,57 +487,33 @@ static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed) > { > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev); > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > int ret; > > - ret = device_for_each_child(&rvdev->dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); > + ret = device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); > if (ret) > - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); > -} > - > -/** > - * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev > - * > - * @dev: the subdevice's dev > - */ > -static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev) > -{ > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev); > - > - of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev); > - > - kfree(rvdev); > + dev_warn(dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); > } > > -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > +static int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > { > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - char name[16]; > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > int ret; > > - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index); > - rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev; > - ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent); > + ret = copy_dma_range_map(dev, rproc->dev.parent); > if (ret) > return ret; > > - rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release; > - dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name); > - dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev); > > - ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev); > - if (ret) { > - put_device(&rvdev->dev); > - return ret; > - } > /* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */ > - set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > + set_dma_ops(dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > > - ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev, > - dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > if (ret) { > - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, > - "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... %x\n", > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... %x\n", > dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ret); > + return ret; > } > > rproc_register_rvdev(rvdev); > @@ -548,30 +523,9 @@ int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > > rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > > - return 0; > -} > - > -static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > -{ > - struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - > - rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > - rproc_unregister_rvdev(rvdev); > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > -} > - > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > -{ > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount); > - struct rproc_vring *rvring; > - int id; > + dev_dbg(dev, "virtio dev %d added\n", rvdev->index); > > - for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) { > - rvring = &rvdev->vring[id]; > - rproc_free_vring(rvring); > - } > - > - rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev); > + return 0; > } > > /** > @@ -590,8 +544,7 @@ rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *vdev_d > pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "rproc-virtio", vdev_data->index, vdev_data, > sizeof(*vdev_data)); > if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) { > - dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, > - "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > } > > return pdev; > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index 542a3d4664f2..7951a3e2b62a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -614,10 +614,8 @@ struct rproc_vring { > > /** > * struct rproc_vdev - remoteproc state for a supported virtio device > - * @refcount: reference counter for the vdev and vring allocations > * @subdev: handle for registering the vdev as a rproc subdevice > * @pdev: remoteproc virtio platform device > - * @dev: device struct used for reference count semantics > * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h) > * @node: list node > * @rproc: the rproc handle > @@ -626,11 +624,9 @@ struct rproc_vring { > * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table > */ > struct rproc_vdev { > - struct kref refcount; > > struct rproc_subdev subdev; > struct platform_device *pdev; > - struct device dev; > > unsigned int id; > struct list_head node; > -- > 2.17.1 >