Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1741159pxb; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoN3NDJ0CKtXhEptmj/SEVEJBC71BYkce4p/wi12hDNgvNlS34CA7VaT6i0EGJOqe5id72 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:350b:: with SMTP id b11mr450855edd.341.1634752071529; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634752071; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uOr15g9aweIh+zZkHoeObd+oLoFnvrBvZZtq48JWgNbla123lKQzpl9ycC+T5B9Tk+ 0WX1YFrMywD8KhYLzFSBkqr5/azj2SdqEPWSW8ciuS4sjOR9EKpmmhNsQgjUSeYaBibr vNehB+cg3o1FEaHt+W42fRpYhJPAJ1L7PDQFXIznWCmYWH3EZwu0qa28HRW6W0LckB5R +E0rhrZod2FwoCLnWOjZIKf9Q9sK2SdjYQD6thsSvix/893YDtqQxKLjC1yefcRQW3Em 4NXag8qh1tEvHvBjTVhCw0zlA8FolEc4dkOVrnMe5SHQE2EJKn5oFZra+rsh2nNvznHe zCQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to:from; bh=pa9mak8T9BNiRLJ7ygYE0k9FJRV3mEGLFK7eZzD1XLo=; b=WYkyW5DXKcApASPleax4/4uBCu+plMl4mD1n2EdThUQRFdETO5ttWziTdBrDi5XIfH Fn/9c72o2m6oKle4DJHT/tXdA3AXNlKs++dQStp3yCx6vHEXu3UH54kO/KGriYbwVk7E A/RpqLWx6U3tU18sQgQ3blhDgXEL0i3MMuSyyhpr7Fm0dAi4OcB5CsXGGFTGupndarbt HvucBpA3qoNjfItg3U293ihZhPzwpNj8g0AIXm+E5LtPAq3rP30vuoVZPekAZKSX0dOx noY4LcTDq1DasVzsWQPx7bjLFXNNuzKCqpCjSmjCSCKTd0nZa2v2qKu2IQ20/ARO7kAP 1itA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w13si4905795ede.169.2021.10.20.10.47.26; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231228AbhJTRrY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:47:24 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:43342 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231202AbhJTRrP (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:47:15 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:50228) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mdFe8-00EwIU-Fz; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:45:00 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:47894 helo=localhost.localdomain) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mdFe7-001NdN-FW; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:45:00 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Al Viro , Kees Cook , "Eric W. Biederman" , David Miller , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:43:54 -0500 Message-Id: <20211020174406.17889-8-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <87y26nmwkb.fsf@disp2133> References: <87y26nmwkb.fsf@disp2133> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-XM-SPF: eid=1mdFe7-001NdN-FW;;;mid=<20211020174406.17889-8-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+m7zFDieSDYP9ie4oAgZCOoskjv4SbOX8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels, XMSubLong,XM_B_SpammyWords autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.2 XM_B_SpammyWords One or more commonly used spammy words * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 376 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.08 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (3.1%), b_tie_ro: 10 (2.6%), parse: 1.09 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 16 (4.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.36 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 22 (5.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.44 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.13 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 92 (24.5%), check_bayes: 91 (24.1%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.7%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.7%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 72 (19.2%), b_finish: 0.86 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 213 (56.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.68 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.1 (0.8%), poll_dns_idle: 0.82 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.4 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 13 (3.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 08/20] signal/sparc: In setup_tsb_params convert open coded BUG into BUG X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The function setup_tsb_params has exactly one caller tsb_grow. The function tsb_grow passes in a tsb_bytes value that is between 8192 and 1048576 inclusive, and is guaranteed to be a power of 2. The function setup_tsb_params verifies this property with a switch statement and then prints an error and causes the task to exit if this is not true. In practice that print statement can never be reached because tsb_grow never passes in a bad tsb_size. So if tsb_size ever gets a bad value that is a kernel bug. So replace the do_exit which is effectively an open coded version of BUG() with an actuall call to BUG(). Making it clearer that this is a case that can never, and should never happen. Cc: David Miller Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c b/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c index 0dce4b7ff73e..912205787161 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void setup_tsb_params(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long tsb_idx, unsign default: printk(KERN_ERR "TSB[%s:%d]: Impossible TSB size %lu, killing process.\n", current->comm, current->pid, tsb_bytes); - do_exit(SIGSEGV); + BUG(); } tte |= pte_sz_bits(page_sz); -- 2.20.1