Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:40:56 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>, kishon@ti.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: Add lan966x ethernet serdes PHY driver
Message-ID: <YXEEcJHuEdFLPyCU@matsya>
References: <20211015123920.176782-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
 <20211015123920.176782-4-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
 <YW8HIHTCVgB+URJ5@matsya>
 <20211020091733.fxph2pq3xa3byvry@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
 <YXA3VVUGEjUR4HDC@matsya>
 <YXA6lZBTeA6aNxVD@piout.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YXA6lZBTeA6aNxVD@piout.net>
Precedence: bulk

On 20-10-21, 17:49, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 20/10/2021 21:05:49+0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> > > > 
> > > > Any reason why this is dual licensed, why not GPL only?
> > > 
> > > No reason, I think I copy this from a different file.
> > 
> > Please have a chat with your lawyers on the correct license this should
> > have!
> Dual GPL and MIT was Microsemi's policy, I'm not sure it carried over to
> Microchip.

That is why they need to talk to someone and decide what license
applies :)

-- 
~Vinod