Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:23:20 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc:     david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        hch@infradead.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
        agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        ira.weiny@intel.com, willy@infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] pmem: pmem_dax_direct_access() to honor the
 DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY flag
Message-ID: <YXFNqI/+nbdVEoif@infradead.org>
References: <20211021001059.438843-1-jane.chu@oracle.com>
 <20211021001059.438843-4-jane.chu@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211021001059.438843-4-jane.chu@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:10:56PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> -	if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512,
> -					PFN_PHYS(nr_pages))))
> +	if (unlikely(!(flags & DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY) &&
> +		is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512,
> +				PFN_PHYS(nr_pages))))

The indentation here is pretty messed up. Something like this would
be move normal:

	if (unlikely(!(flags & DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY) &&
			is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512,
				    PFN_PHYS(nr_pages)))) {

but if we don't really need the unlikely we could do an actually
readable variant:

	if (!(flags & DAXDEV_F_RECOVERY) &&
	    is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512, PFN_PHYS(nr_pages)))