Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp566525pxb; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:21:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzefauT61yruuNV4EMZW4vLHlIT83Qkas2fvaJ32OPveeBeyK8huD00v6gWdNbO1xBfXfiv X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e0b:: with SMTP id hp11mr6616844ejc.549.1634818872703; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:21:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634818872; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=v2yGth5D53xz9tx5Yskp7tKgozn7/0vMU1HpQTHK+wiMA/MXUTUQnBPLNDpeuKSJs1 qBCn7mMyYLLg4QwBnx4I0eBQEAlglDJ7IPARapaGTdllYMRuJTZp5Wk70DUotNJXyCy6 GjhBt/1VVffFdETXjFMiQcXzWGkK3tRQpTAcl2dV7pmvTfK4ZOdEBTocpKMwbADkRQBh CXqcry7rKpA5Gym2kDEGHRyBp6QGydJRgrRIImt9QhAiiPe3j4tID7vFjIpmoTu04S1r 8rFIMb+shYNoX6o9xpZMFJ0wqpac5FakJNTKhR/GHW9wHS/jJojEuWqxJEoU6jlhSFEZ AfoQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=+zM+nMK1HZxbrMEX+7WA9aZiICfi8i50tbPTbPaKT0Y=; b=OWc5n96p4diJFJYuzLH5/37wCelcaRm7VkapLHTLsjvJIH/F8vcLM3WhfzrCoV6Pzw Y88I38wA7gCbmNcL2cf4V1G4ylRo18nExTSS5t5O5csA7KJWnvS6rLLNpK0l6ksT0OkL QlsWHAPS9ROqmGDU0wWe2mBh1IDaXneIV1z40Qhu1NWq3hrOyBGizHKAIdG7sl1baBU5 BttvgmWweUgqEzq6vsG61CRBnQDWJAbgaKcXZIO8hpJb/gRbbs+OVX2XMxaIix9dXSyj FbTYuGbnxopfQTv/QrjuhHq03vQJlG9HC8176yww8A/AJpzs1rLRaXODZdqU6TCO3qoi UWZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c22si6628270edn.592.2021.10.21.05.20.48; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231676AbhJUMVE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:21:04 -0400 Received: from 212.199.177.27.static.012.net.il ([212.199.177.27]:45859 "EHLO herzl.nuvoton.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231664AbhJUMVC (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:21:02 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 549 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:20:34 EDT Received: from taln60.nuvoton.co.il (ntil-fw [212.199.177.25]) by herzl.nuvoton.co.il (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 19LC6pD7003254; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:06:51 +0300 Received: by taln60.nuvoton.co.il (Postfix, from userid 10140) id 88FAE63A1D; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:07:02 +0300 (IDT) From: amirmizi6@gmail.com To: Eyal.Cohen@nuvoton.com, jarkko@kernel.org, oshrialkoby85@gmail.com, alexander.steffen@infineon.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benoit.houyere@st.com, eajames@linux.ibm.com, joel@jms.id.au Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, oshri.alkoby@nuvoton.com, tmaimon77@gmail.com, gcwilson@us.ibm.com, kgoldman@us.ibm.com, Dan.Morav@nuvoton.com, oren.tanami@nuvoton.com, shmulik.hager@nuvoton.com, amir.mizinski@nuvoton.com, Amir Mizinski Subject: [PATCH v16 1/6] tpm_tis: Fix expected bit handling and send all bytes in one shot without last byte in exception Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:05:52 +0300 Message-Id: <20211021120557.69234-2-amirmizi6@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20211021120557.69234-1-amirmizi6@gmail.com> References: <20211021120557.69234-1-amirmizi6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Amir Mizinski Detected an incorrect implementation of the send command. Currently, the driver polls the TPM_STS.stsValid field until TRUE; then it reads TPM_STS register again to verify only that TPM_STS.expect field is FALSE (i.e., it ignores TPM_STS.stsValid). Since TPM_STS.stsValid represents the TPM_STS.expect validity, a check of only one of these fields is wrong. Fix this condition so that both fields are checked in the same TPM_STS register read. Modify the signature of 'wait_for_tpm_stat()', adding an additional "result" parameter to its call. 'wait_for_tpm_stat()' is now polling the TPM_STS with a mask and waits for the value in result. This modification adds the ability to check if certain TPM_STS bits have been cleared. For example, use the new parameter to check in status that TPM_STS_VALID is set and also that TPM_STS_EXPECT is zeroed. This prevents a racy check. In addition, the send command was changed to comply with TCG_DesignPrinciples_TPM2p0Driver_vp24_pubrev.pdf as follows: - send all command bytes in one loop - remove special handling of the last byte Fixes: 27084efee0c3 (tpm: driver for next generation TPM chips) Suggested-by: Benoit Houyere Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 68 +++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c index 69579ef..0985184 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, return false; } -static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, - unsigned long timeout, wait_queue_head_t *queue, - bool check_cancel) +static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, u8 result, + unsigned long timeout, + wait_queue_head_t *queue, bool check_cancel) { unsigned long stop; long rc; @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, /* check current status */ status = chip->ops->status(chip); - if ((status & mask) == mask) + if ((status & mask) == result) return 0; stop = jiffies + timeout; @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, usleep_range(TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN, TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX); status = chip->ops->status(chip); - if ((status & mask) == mask) + if ((status & mask) == result) return 0; } while (time_before(jiffies, stop)); } @@ -260,9 +260,10 @@ static int recv_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) while (size < count) { rc = wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, - TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, - chip->timeout_c, - &priv->read_queue, true); + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + chip->timeout_c, &priv->read_queue, + true); if (rc < 0) return rc; burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip); @@ -315,8 +316,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) goto out; } - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { + if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, TPM_STS_VALID, + chip->timeout_c, &priv->int_queue, + false) < 0) { size = -ETIME; goto out; } @@ -342,61 +344,40 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len) struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); int rc, status, burstcnt; size_t count = 0; - bool itpm = priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND; status = tpm_tis_status(chip); if ((status & TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY) == 0) { tpm_tis_ready(chip); - if (wait_for_tpm_stat - (chip, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, chip->timeout_b, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { + if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, + TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, + chip->timeout_b, &priv->int_queue, + false) < 0) { rc = -ETIME; goto out_err; } } - while (count < len - 1) { + while (count < len) { burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip); if (burstcnt < 0) { dev_err(&chip->dev, "Unable to read burstcount\n"); rc = burstcnt; goto out_err; } - burstcnt = min_t(int, burstcnt, len - count - 1); + burstcnt = min_t(int, burstcnt, len - count); rc = tpm_tis_write_bytes(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), burstcnt, buf + count); if (rc < 0) goto out_err; count += burstcnt; - - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { - rc = -ETIME; - goto out_err; - } - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); - if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) { - rc = -EIO; - goto out_err; - } } - - /* write last byte */ - rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), buf[count]); - if (rc < 0) - goto out_err; - - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { + if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT, + TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_a, + &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { rc = -ETIME; goto out_err; } - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); - if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) { - rc = -EIO; - goto out_err; - } return 0; @@ -451,9 +432,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len) ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6))); dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal); - if (wait_for_tpm_stat - (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur, - &priv->read_queue, false) < 0) { + if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + dur, &priv->read_queue, false) < 0) { rc = -ETIME; goto out_err; } -- 2.7.4