Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp630470pxb; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:35:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJws7N7Ndu+gSS3MeYA+XYjbv1Uira+IeDmFqDPrpXTzHkBLj7af1Sqi0FbT3Ci/WpXiYuD8 X-Received: by 2002:a62:8f53:0:b0:44c:5d10:9378 with SMTP id n80-20020a628f53000000b0044c5d109378mr5998832pfd.19.1634823342767; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:35:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634823342; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cfsca87MyK2/J7MpfqYNM9/kRN4bq3Koanqv0QYxm+TNqDYlqXHpo+rCd67PP3XjIk kO/vf0tgQMZe5x3Z+40fcg8B7SKwrtCr/QBuVPPFIM4hsl/gre7Ll+K+N4qoeiOpWwuQ hsD4H2wX8jkRYFQsFK0+/g54K0mx5PJ5maFog2PyRUpFfW7Khe0RmJiRZHDdUsIE6WG2 1hIb8WFcRbEnBCcPA5Kmt/7HtCMFRrRQb0j/tjQKXWxc4piUyDSyYMa340U3IMaDRTYc OcIZfq465de9zumaO05wg2YVlKNOC4fbI5fnWbSij0L+OZLK8nAEIme5QZgq+MhSqBqQ d3Fw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=v+D88h5WJxpB79j6h3nUGsE9qTjEhabDavYcw0G5Dv4=; b=XV/DpPCGR+IPZGq+RM6HC9EwtxFcQCbwf5KBZ9c/L1TsaTJsJ+mnnw0jA/CtbFzqYV opOv6eZkehcGbbUYl2Rty2aL6Uxmuor2K552L7LvdxxA+8S/wLu24/y+RGwWS3ncSAt3 9ymceGQy4HerdqJB8uyGD98oFZvrU8Dpqu6Rg224q2Vm2fwswZ7kqIRXHUa6EJZdskW0 TbQ/RJ9EUV02lm1oxe7YxSStFb/JhMhgyc6bSzr+pnW8WRg5y/cmwORHPwk9nFWwdsK+ S0UEJpRV/O/rynG/8yhG5Pd5pBFxLAZdyNQFwyPA9COVVJYhoPsyD4FLDCJmmW5tW6LW nLEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 193si2290493pgc.15.2021.10.21.06.35.26; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 06:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230508AbhJUNgp (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:36:45 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:54244 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230072AbhJUNgo (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:36:44 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:40512) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mdYD5-005DQ9-NZ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:34:19 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:46380 helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mdYD4-003epC-7e; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:34:19 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rich Felker , "open list\:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT \(xtensa\)" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "open list\:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , H Peter Anvin , sparclinux , Vincent Chen , Thomas Gleixner , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , Yoshinori Sato , Michael Ellerman , Linux-sh list , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Jonas Bonn , Kees Cook , Vasily Gorbik , Heiko Carstens , Openrisc , Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Nick Hu , linuxppc-dev , Oleg Nesterov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Maciej Rozycki , Linus Torvalds , David Miller , Greentime Hu References: <87y26nmwkb.fsf@disp2133> <877de7jrev.fsf@disp2133> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:33:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:09:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87tuhaijsw.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mdYD4-003epC-7e;;;mid=<87tuhaijsw.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+Mpe2HbWR2YDGhZ3vVJNTbKaHiNpeOXoM= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TR_Symld_Words,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG, T_TooManySym_01,T_TooManySym_02,T_TooManySym_03,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4995] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 TR_Symld_Words too many words that have symbols inside * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_03 6+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;Geert Uytterhoeven X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 897 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (1.4%), b_tie_ro: 10 (1.2%), parse: 1.14 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (1.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.00 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 27 (3.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.31 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.10 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 286 (31.9%), check_bayes: 285 (31.7%), b_tokenize: 12 (1.3%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (0.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.2 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 260 (28.9%), b_finish: 0.94 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 537 (59.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.61 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.0 (0.3%), poll_dns_idle: 1.00 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 3.2 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 10 (1.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV) X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Hi Eric, > > Patch 21/20? In reviewing another part of the patchset Linus asked if force_sigsegv could go away. It can't completely but I can get this far. Given that it is just a cleanup it makes most sense to me as an additional patch on top of what is already here. > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing >> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is >> wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer. >> >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" > >> arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Thank you. Eric