Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933112AbWLaJpp (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:45:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933110AbWLaJpp (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:45:45 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42364 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933106AbWLaJpn (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:45:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:45:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20061231.014533.71091424.davem@davemloft.net> To: miklos@szeredi.hu Cc: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20061230224604.GA3350@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20061230.212338.92583434.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1747 Lines: 41 From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:10:35 +0100 > > Therefore, FUSE probably could have been fixed by judicious use > > of copy_{to,from}_user_page() calls instead of adding this new > > ad-hoc flush_anon_page() thing. > > Probably, but I don't think either interface is perfect. > copy_*_user_page() will double flush the user mapping > (get_user_pages() already does a flush_dcache_page()). Actually > nothing except ptrace uses the copy_*_user_page() interface even > though there are many uses of get_user_pages(). > > What I think get_user_pages() really needs is a single operation that > > - flushes the virtual address view > - flushes the kernel view > > regardles whether the page is anonymous or file backed. I guess part of the problem is that flush_dcache_page() could have better defined semantics. Sparc64 never notices this precisely because it can flush by physical page and thus it can just do the flush on anonymous pages synchronously very cheaply. ARM probably avoids it because it would be very expensive since it needs to flush by virtual address, so in the best case it would need to walk the RMAP mapping list and hit every user mapping, then flush again for the kernel side virtual address of the direct mapping to that physical page too. It is certainly the case that all of this stuff could be done in a much cleaner manner. Although it's really hard for me to get excited by this and do the work since sparc64 already works :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/