Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp796633pxb; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxK1KU4nh0KdoNtykGy4Rxw51t/5edlgYrcGhzpsuUYxpcc6wtT5J3PdeFBG6fxTl20AUGd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5255:: with SMTP id t21mr8764499edd.103.1634834263026; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634834263; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RL0afrqL1IugNjRC5kpm1hJD9wOkAJL3u/T1rYs6FsdkmRIxQdr3huqnoKt2xTjaQr 4pwL2Aow8jinfE3oWMexigQQAQZZK1Jhay+QwdO4H12Gb03Y5sAXrrLLITzUk+w/wDHm 1WwAGXW2oAsdRYLcMhdKMeoIzurypgufyTNWR/YME9QdtZUtX5X5EAUSxUUxXtJU2WnS GeIurtddqV3GGBA/cJ9+jrgBNpXGaNQpwnCqErjgctMg2pNLkfc/eg2jmZC3HYTAPEmM 3VU/ArAeqkGP+WnOibjus+8Yf7HIngqjaMo8kLwrqEQs6rDdGRkg/iIUl81UUL+EF635 j4EQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=N4WV3ixHR/oLGM7dU0FWRxHeCOFfehfHZhviVXeeJsw=; b=dHD3+2RmCXjrpJvYfCy3DnSFTbJV/tHIxd502jDq7OozsfQNETaPvkWnOulxGqmXEH lwxxF6R+Au7uHjeG2Fw0gjkuz6LXD8qZ5O8I7q6Ugo6gVXcyHlSqKgSkredUOKdKGfbH S3pw6+dRUGwJFr7odyob7bRos5NFWeBUluKjR5PXBcc6XFV8pbwn76X/lFQjbK37zgRM iZdDIy8rZQ3q4ypm7tflvBB2/VcTtR4vaQIEEeRUgFOWQom/52NdYaNUz0AaQrfR4IOI H4YjDGp1I2rihtjvttB9edcUll8rJzWDmFiTZQoCkTEKkmm0jxyytzU9aelHwubkKUhS aKZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mxIE4yy2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z1si7677467ejf.437.2021.10.21.09.37.18; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=mxIE4yy2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231933AbhJUQhk (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:37:40 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46870 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229702AbhJUQhg (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:37:36 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7C6B60E90; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1634834120; bh=fC9Xv86+coJ2zuSO0iIEWX4DxbQQGwNHwTsttv+5aMk=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mxIE4yy26b2dfsh5mrHfv6/8I6zhSn5f961fO2XV9wL/jxfj+BQrcHScQ38SDSHoB 655Fgp9t0O/sDIWF97Jj4zU0as+NC1J3PH9hNMvfsE8dxXLA+3mry7yW5hIXPOnmzH VOxxwBfGlAe8tEQNMNOlos41eRUdDL+tkV7GPHZsmOqYV3pXPkjLs5pp1enh5mkCg9 DHcChCDHhtJ9Cw/mCz9CtdAwaotssQI4JSt26uMHXTxdHdbfeAk01D08QxpaRY2Tzm 7IwAsYhm5sQGgOirGXybojNmJ9Ce4mrtkowB+ctXTrFMSwuotlAGmOqXvILURT4xQG /okAqDNpVSRnA== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ceph: add remote object copy counter to fs client From: Jeff Layton To: Patrick Donnelly Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs?= Henriques , Ilya Dryomov , Ceph Development , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:35:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20211020143708.14728-1-lhenriques@suse.de> <34e379f9dec1cbdf09fffd8207f6ef7f4e1a6841.camel@kernel.org> <99209198dd9d8634245f153a90e4091851635a16.camel@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 (3.40.4-2.fc34) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 12:18 -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 09:52 -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:27 PM Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 15:37 +0100, Lu?s Henriques wrote: > > > > > This counter will keep track of the number of remote object copies done on > > > > > copy_file_range syscalls. This counter will be filesystem per-client, and > > > > > can be accessed from the client debugfs directory. > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Patrick Donnelly > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lu?s Henriques > > > > > --- > > > > > This is an RFC to reply to Patrick's request in [0]. Note that I'm not > > > > > 100% sure about the usefulness of this patch, or if this is the best way > > > > > to provide the functionality Patrick requested. Anyway, this is just to > > > > > get some feedback, hence the RFC. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > -- > > > > > Lu?s > > > > > > > > > > [0] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/42720 > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this would be better integrated into the stats infrastructure. > > > > > > > > Maybe you could add a new set of "copy" stats to struct > > > > ceph_client_metric that tracks the total copy operations done, their > > > > size and latency (similar to read and write ops)? > > > > > > I think it's a good idea to integrate this into "stats" but I think a > > > local debugfs file for some counters is still useful. The "stats" > > > module is immature at this time and I'd rather not build any qa tests > > > (yet) that rely on it. > > > > > > Can we generalize this patch-set to a file named "op_counters" or > > > similar and additionally add other OSD ops performed by the kclient? > > > > > > > > > Tracking this sort of thing is the main purpose of the stats code. I'm > > really not keen on adding a whole separate set of files for reporting > > this. > > Maybe I'm confused. Is there some "file" which is already used for > this type of debugging information? Or do you mean the code for > sending stats to the MDS to support cephfs-top? > > > What's the specific problem with relying on the data in debugfs > > "metrics" file? > > Maybe no problem? I wasn't aware of a "metrics" file. > Yes. For instance: # cat /sys/kernel/debug/ceph/*/metrics item total ------------------------------------------ opened files / total inodes 0 / 4 pinned i_caps / total inodes 5 / 4 opened inodes / total inodes 0 / 4 item total avg_lat(us) min_lat(us) max_lat(us) stdev(us) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- read 0 0 0 0 0 write 5 914013 824797 1092343 103476 metadata 79 12856 1572 114572 13262 item total avg_sz(bytes) min_sz(bytes) max_sz(bytes) total_sz(bytes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- read 0 0 0 0 0 write 5 4194304 4194304 4194304 20971520 item total miss hit ------------------------------------------------- d_lease 11 0 29 caps 5 68 10702 I'm proposing that Luis add new lines for "copy" to go along with the "read" and "write" ones. The "total" counter should give you a count of the number of operations. -- Jeff Layton