Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp811842pxb; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxksydh1z6Ift6GxVbCCDO+UniJxQIxWz0idwVTNgMBmGkBG1YcbjZ2j9aLnf+lkfOle3wd X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2446:b0:13f:9bc:83fb with SMTP id l6-20020a170903244600b0013f09bc83fbmr6442601pls.0.1634835383747; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634835383; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rq0foB1M5Dj+CXllvcrS35AEF8jmpcMmdMe6wK8YEOtdilp8ViA1jWr2P1i+NjGDCS vtW2sh9arAXHqyWmcf0U1CDb7PLtEiyJEBJpryFEIf6rO+hm8Ds3M0SSUXMHr9oq0neq sm3cpjKnrg+vbaR3d82TM1JUQU1kMbvesvBC9mszqWslCjH/dIdqmCaPS+yWlBfqIfn3 3xD4B3R3NOgLPLaWmFIBe7w0tpl1Y4d5qwVP3Opsn9JgbZe874EkcIJU/VIxKHLWaY0Z HD1rPPo4uSVFHO0YXwDCc69qnqqVzOWBH5d0ZDx8ikwVWAKwXGYIrOu6W0Oik4d4VZT7 1TZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=jreoeR1LxgTHoPY2t8gudln9leFgfbditimX5Q5Y3To=; b=AB0cGj15Ivsn7Np91VBHLSKlm/m8yrP+bebuH7aUPzoCIe0t2lvJgM3GZ4VVZajY3C /jQLNZ1Cdyg49XA9EmzSqOFxMUiAvIeBuk3Q6TVPsBgAbAb+8rQiB5gcpwRqTIeCrUHn GW1eW4Tl6Dh6yzB04CGkMWzxPD3cOYTH8+MYFKE8zqKlMcbquGrvJayXnyueOFq8CsIy xAv+2lz9MvbCklbOX5cn5Af3xklFfDOE7W1dJkmkPTtTjOwCOJG+kdK1QhyvUblPOvE2 Y8sap1/eVbpZKNnkVrdmBG37WAJ0cXSv/qPNrigh9of2l17kxGX2V5BdZUsLOlgtsQNp xKow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p2si6759976plb.83.2021.10.21.09.56.09; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232086AbhJUQ5A (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:57:00 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:45202 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231574AbhJUQ46 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:56:58 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E2FD6E; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.25.56]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B908D3F70D; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:54:39 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar Cc: Cristian Marussi , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] mailbox: pcc: Add support for PCCT extended PCC subspaces Message-ID: <20211021165439.2cgyjjm5bwb6ydbv@bogus> References: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20211011100949.4ck26vos5apts45e@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211011100949.4ck26vos5apts45e@bogus> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jassi, Gentle ping! On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:09:49AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Jassi, > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Though the series is about adding support for PCCT extended PCC subspaces, > > except one patch, remaining are either preparatory or clean up to add > > the PCCT extended PCC subspaces. Only patch 12 adds the support of extended > > PCC type3/4 subspaces. > > > > The main change affecting your is the change in pcc_mbox_request_channel > > to avoid clien driver using con_priv member which is designed for controller > > private pointer rather than for client's to use that. > > > > Once I have ack from Guenter, is it OK to get this merged via mailbox tree. > Rafael is happy for me to maintain this PCC part of ACPI. Do you prefer > to merge patches directly or do you prefer pull request ? Let me know. > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep -- Regards, Sudeep