Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:54:39 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] mailbox: pcc: Add support for PCCT extended PCC
 subspaces
Message-ID: <20211021165439.2cgyjjm5bwb6ydbv@bogus>
References: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <20211011100949.4ck26vos5apts45e@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211011100949.4ck26vos5apts45e@bogus>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jassi,

Gentle ping!

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:09:49AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Jassi,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Though the series is about adding support for PCCT extended PCC subspaces,
> > except one patch, remaining are either preparatory or clean up to add
> > the PCCT extended PCC subspaces. Only patch 12 adds the support of extended
> > PCC type3/4 subspaces.
> > 
> > The main change affecting your is the change in pcc_mbox_request_channel
> > to avoid clien driver using con_priv member which is designed for controller
> > private pointer rather than for client's to use that.
> > 
> 
> Once I have ack from Guenter, is it OK to get this merged via mailbox tree.
> Rafael is happy for me to maintain this PCC part of ACPI. Do you prefer
> to merge patches directly or do you prefer pull request ? Let me know.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Sudeep

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep