Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:07:52 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
        Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@cloudflare.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
        Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= <toke@redhat.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
        Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <6171ba88e5825_663a720836@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQ+_MysCNnaPZd550wQaohtWTikmgnsysoZhnNpwPgv23A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20211015112336.1973229-1-markpash@cloudflare.com>
 <20211015112336.1973229-2-markpash@cloudflare.com>
 <CAADnVQ+_MysCNnaPZd550wQaohtWTikmgnsysoZhnNpwPgv23A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add ifindex to bpf_sk_lookup
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:24 AM Mark Pashmfouroush
> <markpash@cloudflare.com> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index 6fc59d61937a..9bd3e8b8a659 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -6262,6 +6262,7 @@ struct bpf_sk_lookup {
> >         __u32 local_ip4;        /* Network byte order */
> >         __u32 local_ip6[4];     /* Network byte order */
> >         __u32 local_port;       /* Host byte order */
> > +       __u32 ifindex;          /* Maps to skb->dev->ifindex */
> 
> Is the comment accurate?
> The bpf_sk_lookup_kern ifindex is populated with inet_iif(skb).
> Which is skb->skb_iif at this point (I think).
> skb->dev->ifindex would typically mean destination or egress ifindex.
> In __sk_buff we have 'ifindex' and 'ingress_ifindex' to differentiate them.
> If it's really dev->ifindex than keeping 'ifindex' name here would be correct,
> but looking at how it's populated in inet/udp_lookup makes me wonder
> whether it should be named 'ingress_ifindex' instead and comment clarified.
> 
> If/when you resubmit please trim cc list to a minimum.

At least in the tcp cases its coming from inet_iif which is either
the rtable or skb->skb_iif. Agree would be nice to fixup the comment.

Thanks.