Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933208AbWLaUJI (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:09:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933209AbWLaUJI (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:09:08 -0500 Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.151]:24853 "EHLO mtagate2.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933208AbWLaUJH (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:09:07 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:09:03 +0200 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Linux kernel mailing list , Randy Dunlap , trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros. Message-ID: <20061231200903.GF3730@rhun.ibm.com> References: <20061231194501.GE3730@rhun.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 632 Lines: 16 On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > there would appear to be *lots* of cases where the ({ }) notation is > used when nothing is being returned. i'm not sure you can be that > adamant about that distinction at this point. IMHO, the main point of CodingStyle is to clarify how new code should be written and old code should've been written. Cheers, Muli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/