Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <48953634-5b7c-72d6-5fcb-a1b25800f443@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 09:14:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] nSVM: use vmcb_save_area_cached in
 nested_vmcb_valid_sregs()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20211011143702.1786568-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
 <20211011143702.1786568-5-eesposit@redhat.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211011143702.1786568-5-eesposit@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/10/21 16:36, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> +
> +out_free_save:
> +	memset(&svm->nested.save, 0, sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area_cached));
> +

This memset is not strictly necessary, is it?  (Same for out_free_ctl 
later on).

Paolo