Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933245AbXAADs2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933246AbXAADs2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:28 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:38855 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933245AbXAADs2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4597A4A2.9060304@flex.com> References: <20061230.211941.74748799.davem@davemloft.net> <459784AD.1010308@firmworks.com> <45978CE9.7090700@flex.com> <20061231.024917.59652177.davem@davemloft.net> <4597A4A2.9060304@flex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5798025b8c1eef2c3536c56ac7711560@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@laptop.org, David Miller , wmb@firmworks.com, jg@laptop.org From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 04:48:50 +0100 To: David Kahn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1311 Lines: 35 > I would not exactly call what we have for powerpc > "exporting the OFW device tree". I don't quite know > what it is, but it isn't as simple as exporting the > OFW device tree. I don't think we really wanted to > get into any of that here. The Linux PowerPC port uses an OF-like device tree on *every* platform, even those that don't have a native OF. It also has to work around lots of bugs in many OF implementations. It's doing lots of stuff, and not all of it is nicely separated into logical modules I'm afraid. > Sure they can take advantage of it, if what they need > to export is a read-only copy of the actual device tree > without any legacy burden or having a writable/changeable > copy of it with a trivial implementation. So give them an interface that allows them to hook up to your new code :-) > This is a trivial implementation that suits it's purpose. > It's simple. I'm not sure what more is needed for this > project when it's pretty clear that i386 will never need > any additional support for open firmware. Never say never... Segher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/