Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1831038pxb; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:28:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygMXF4NOiPW4mfMWpgYXSX6b2ZNsBVV0dkmk0wVjdTa6oGNb18VzsPAU3RDjTaY3O9Da5H X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de91:: with SMTP id j17mr597227edv.335.1634916481489; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:28:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634916481; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w/6FHB0A+NVeb52yhgFptrNmkVs9WHwKaKatkkV87CgRDJEzADViRteV5PQJWqiT62 Mre/2JIwiJtkVQyaS1r3k06rDkXUs9H1w4T/yVh+L/d2tSYq4GT1s/gFdlYCzH4kfl9s eR/pYp98aOH7GaaPSrOu/c70Ia1c/tUhNvyZqqVQOwZDyZrvjalnj+s8siHx4LuapyXj S22OGct0RKSma/AWIpoK0nS1XwUYPWmiesFr59w5oIvFTwXxXIPGCaYvd5dJku6joVsA pYiCYEqR5NYFfEtL71YUI7XB+fmZwaBGjd1WtLULQTxPxADCa5KECVHOm8h54cYGVUCA RRxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=WKn/MMnrjzSTMvrkCX2L7r2/M5K0U88gx7mskxYYYD8=; b=mFmJ7jQIgKZL/LR2RfAvLsnjt8s5PGYM1X6PiyWIPCuevcGM1BW4KEMhDEHiolPr92 acUwkcDeneRi1TRWvHs7mQOLNGu3T00cPiIaBQrFMJrkXYBzZKP8i+juYgVVl+2Lnv81 04KUGXbhGe4yin8Y3HQBAKxA5uiU2ZnjzH7JtFNTPlDTxeAfG/rGiKT4fx905luPQ1Gy EOD7cWlznFcdnxcsjNPPHg0ezIDvZz05MeVf8jNYCbkx3QOm6th8JAHNWVAKKY1MoziL wuNN8pQpwsUdRqnlIbZFa9zlR1NP7BeL5/lprV3xKdqejEPCrDpgrd2XTKcoe0hlZfSR FCFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="PPxKsEu/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n11si11021544ejl.110.2021.10.22.08.27.38; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="PPxKsEu/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233488AbhJVP1b (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:27:31 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:25063 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233414AbhJVP1R (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:27:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634916299; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WKn/MMnrjzSTMvrkCX2L7r2/M5K0U88gx7mskxYYYD8=; b=PPxKsEu/pBMspA3dFpP/TF0u33zvmJHP7KyzDsBNjK+0O+7YsK52gwS1UJxTuyL/EX1S0t ejj+9885F42Baxm9d0grs1cPd6nRM6F44HxFNfIW44KXwdoDk9Qcjo9p2AzYnRMzFyIbQY AeFNY5Nt5grpxSYeOSKBWfDjfJkeDt4= Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-555-ivzLzqAnO72d79Kko2QgPg-1; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:24:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ivzLzqAnO72d79Kko2QgPg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id d3-20020a056402516300b003db863a248eso4020254ede.16 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WKn/MMnrjzSTMvrkCX2L7r2/M5K0U88gx7mskxYYYD8=; b=dWSBAm86s1QuMPEDrEmG1s8XiTJG0Yg11/UBlUPe7rvYmmdfIiCba4+L8PQxXgAyeH flnTQFiQzBuz3Q2UVXrahgI1AmjCC/AAB2oY0lQFlMynl5gDnTCR9pfMDYvYI3FyXCZ0 5jhCp3Np8RB0WGZzner3OjNrAI+vADRDTsTDBsbqvE+BCxuIEwVDEW1wxyzisjWIWDqs YOyyq6e758EMHYb5sZp8rBlf9XQuLONbThuwdG3QXgcrR5uTb4v4k/8mVq2JhqnNHkM2 fh63yC+zb3Awp5mlyBVPhHbpObQi+WWCWuI4gQdSLOI7SRXhDQ4RTqANHs8oJhrX6aIk TQhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530E7fARWbXILrkUra+WPwmQ9Ql6+rOH4zoxKnta7UItaK9xjNDB WFsotz3csKBJxHM2BJcphlRUIjf2GooGyo/nwHgDOUoiOcVsDMW1jSDsdW8DQE+bp/UCtUTroCg S/9nPHGy+8hIWw7yqhFyu5dDu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ca18:: with SMTP id jt24mr227107ejb.325.1634916294056; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:24:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ca18:: with SMTP id jt24mr227080ejb.325.1634916293883; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l23sm3922047ejn.15.2021.10.22.08.24.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44630562-a855-f3e2-a427-9f3da3abdd70@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:24:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: x86: Clarify the kvm_run.emulation_failure structure layout Content-Language: en-US To: David Edmondson , Sean Christopherson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Vitaly Kuznetsov , x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Ingo Molnar , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Wanpeng Li , David Matlack References: <20210920103737.2696756-1-david.edmondson@oracle.com> <20210920103737.2696756-2-david.edmondson@oracle.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/10/21 11:29, David Edmondson wrote: > On Tuesday, 2021-10-12 at 23:45:43 GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, David Edmondson wrote: >>> Until more flags for kvm_run.emulation_failure flags are defined, it >>> is undetermined whether new payload elements corresponding to those >>> flags will be additive or alternative. As a hint to userspace that an >>> alternative is possible, wrap the current payload elements in a union. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson >>> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson >>> --- >> >> To complete the set... :-) >> >> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson > > Thanks! > Queued, thanks! Paolo