Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755205AbXAAObT (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:31:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755206AbXAAObT (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:31:19 -0500 Received: from nic.NetDirect.CA ([216.16.235.2]:47888 "EHLO rubicon.netdirect.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755205AbXAAObS (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:31:18 -0500 X-Originating-Ip: 74.109.98.100 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:25:46 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Linux kernel mailing list , Randy Dunlap , trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros. In-Reply-To: <20070101142020.GA16425@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20070101142020.GA16425@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-16.8, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-From: rpjday@mindspring.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1418 Lines: 47 On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:32:25PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > + (a) Enclose those statements in a do - while block: > > + > > + #define macrofun(a, b, c) \ > > + do { \ > > + if (a == 5) \ > > + do_this(b, c); \ > > + } while (0) > > nitpick, please don't add an indentaion level for the do {. Do this > should look like: > > #define macrofun(a, b, c) \ > do { \ > if (a == 5) \ > do_this(b, c); \ > } while (0) the former is the way it's presented in CodingStyle currently, it wasn't my personal opinion on the subject. i was just reproducing what was already there. > > + (b) Use the gcc extension that a compound statement enclosed in > > + parentheses represents an expression: > > + > > + #define macrofun(a, b, c) ({ \ > > if (a == 5) \ > > do_this(b, c); \ > > - } while (0) > > + }) > > I'd rather document to not use this - it makes the code far less > redable. And it's a non-standard extension, something we only > use if it provides us a benefit which it doesn't here. it might be a bit late to put a cork in *that* bottle: $ grep -r "#define.*({" * rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/