Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211022140714.28767-1-jim2101024@gmail.com> <20211022140714.28767-2-jim2101024@gmail.com>
 <YXLPZ4CsQMjHPpJS@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <YXLPZ4CsQMjHPpJS@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:24:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+-6iNz3PMsYDds_uoh_xNoPop-tLn1O9U9wnTmTx+pZyN5ZFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP
 voltage regulators
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
        "open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS" 
        <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:49 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:06:54AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>
> > The use of a regulator property in the pcie EP subnode such as
> > "vpcie12v-supply" depends on a pending pullreq to the pci-bus.yaml
> > file at
> >
> > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/54
>
> This contains updates to add the generic PCIe supply rails, not the
> brcm-ep-a and brcm-ep-b supplies (which as I said on the other patch
> look like they ought to be renamed).  That's fine since they're
> obviously not generic PCIe things but this means that those bindings
> need to be added to the device specific bindings here.  Currently
> there's only an update to the examples.

Just to be clear, and assuming that the brcm-ep-[ab] supply names are
green-lighted by you and Rob, are you saying
I have to update the github site or our YAML file?  If the latter, it
seems odd to be describing
an EP-device property in the YAML for an RC driver since the github
site already describes the EP-device.

Jim