Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp3187770pxb; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:43:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBKY1GtIDz6QTyMapwmn8ZPPC0RnMPPLLizo9hQj3jVrOM+ei0ZJW6twaatGRitUzGejYn X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4410:: with SMTP id y16mr13431710eda.366.1635039805861; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:43:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635039805; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Psy4ITEXJhLoD7TpgiKDodT/zF7yGrn2fRQ16kQrwzXgErEmvfIKdfKlac7iaT1t0n cBk+wL7qwHxywHxpbHCiQ73Hm7u28ITlJq+7ACcxM+H0n5yjUmivAVf3S03R5OFOrgmu RfXdQfyygUQp+qfzIqim99SKdViARks69KKE0/ga4ofYLCOPsP446qIEsGYBOLeTu38O 9sOLPzO2HiHkNWQawAjKYJtz+WF+olmQ2TK4p7o6FrP6L7awTXDGO1cujsGg9ndh3FiH dBzRUCsTDHgmDJoBCW9qg5VrmTRgXuNxy7SxrHIy0dptF5K226F7DyWQtdoRZRH+bYkF BDdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=168bmz/yYfFwP6U7lFaGQfODemUe8D7wUC8wA1EAJbE=; b=zYcL/3udlDZOBdFuxYnSbz9k+o+2rbhM/uiT+FbbaVKrlxpLoDbvt7xpZkpckwCt1k /MZSQ/4NNCClKXTH1RP6MwwrTLASE/Lv70ocvcvKwRIfORqzYF0dzAxhsH4abzuJn5pV yh/BHMIwnjtyg2ryd3cBgt/H1Ntqsw/lvozujyrW64bytLiROkW4N2mTq+30DG/Wiwiw VKd5q3vN9e/5eAvKKhfnQKGUGkPphjs95cTf0yyeSXxgsqmPGjczRiHRtYxYfUkzwyjs sO9Bn5zUc0LltAugJH6BAPAk+j6LpIjHwy2IBbeP3VK9vZEBAKpAUUoJNgnbbTivxHBz vGJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=YHUbMw3h; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qf8si22822237ejc.584.2021.10.23.18.43.01; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=YHUbMw3h; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231511AbhJXBfn (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 23 Oct 2021 21:35:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60044 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231454AbhJXBfm (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2021 21:35:42 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA66860F45; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 01:33:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1635039202; bh=xmfvtK/CuwhoFGDjQWSolRKBpu9P5drS44pisoY6tdU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YHUbMw3h9egpCxV0WhyjAc3Z0RqMu5SxIq6xOuzFbODDzaA4Sur+sigff2KOEnxF1 LQb+DHhrbX1w8YuLwy0JInjcenvaf4jQ+fTEDARnrmx7jz76wg2tCc7y99qPJrowFn jCNki+0N23uzoC6FFYMcVz29gxlokXGFe12aJ1ZppqkrwACueHKGJwTVRTapQl/1Lb f4NfjzBSp/Y8HL+x4/iIZM83AsIrIlAq03oA+NpUTyow6DLKUYoJ7KyE2U4hOh/xCV +coHfrtKZn/X+vcMV8/gS5V/xDYl5dULvCcT2ShOaFn/TW5QTpedLGN5DYLVbwIGVl 75OPGxKSQT4sg== From: guoren@kernel.org To: guoren@kernel.org, anup@brainfault.org, atish.patra@wdc.com, maz@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, palmer@dabbelt.com, heiko@sntech.de, robh@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Guo Ren Subject: [PATCH V5 3/3] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup thead,c900-plic request_threaded_irq with ONESHOT Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 09:33:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20211024013303.3499461-4-guoren@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20211024013303.3499461-1-guoren@kernel.org> References: <20211024013303.3499461-1-guoren@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Guo Ren When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver, only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by hw. Because the thead,c900-plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has been disabled in enable register. Add thead_plic_chip which fix up c906-plic irq source completion problem by unmask/mask wrapper. Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [1]: The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ completion is silently ignored. [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc Signed-off-by: Guo Ren Cc: Anup Patel Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Atish Patra --- Changes since V5: - Move back to mask/unmask - Fixup the problem in eoi callback - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE - Rewrite comment log Changes since V4: - Update comment by Anup Changes since V3: - Rename "c9xx" to "c900" - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference Changes since V2: - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic" - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx PLIC. --- drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf74cfa82045..7c64a7ab56f3 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d) writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); } -static struct irq_chip plic_chip = { +static struct irq_chip sifive_plic_chip = { .name = "SiFive PLIC", .irq_mask = plic_irq_mask, .irq_unmask = plic_irq_unmask, @@ -176,12 +176,43 @@ static struct irq_chip plic_chip = { #endif }; +/* + * Current C9xx PLIC can't complete interrupt when the interrupt + * source is currently disabled for the target. Re-enable the + * interrupt source by unmasking to let hw irq source completion + * succeed. + */ +static void plic_thead_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d) +{ + struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers); + + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) { + plic_irq_unmask(d); + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); + plic_irq_mask(d); + } else { + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); + } +} + +static struct irq_chip thead_plic_chip = { + .name = "T-Head PLIC", + .irq_mask = plic_irq_mask, + .irq_unmask = plic_irq_unmask, + .irq_eoi = plic_thead_irq_eoi, +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + .irq_set_affinity = plic_set_affinity, +#endif +}; + +static struct irq_chip *def_plic_chip = &sifive_plic_chip; + static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq) { struct plic_priv *priv = d->host_data; - irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, &plic_chip, d->host_data, + irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, def_plic_chip, d->host_data, handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); irq_set_noprobe(irq); irq_set_affinity(irq, &priv->lmask); @@ -390,5 +421,14 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node *node, return error; } +static int __init thead_c900_plic_init(struct device_node *node, + struct device_node *parent) +{ + def_plic_chip = &thead_plic_chip; + + return plic_init(node, parent); +} + IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sifive_plic, "sifive,plic-1.0.0", plic_init); IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv_plic0, "riscv,plic0", plic_init); /* for legacy systems */ +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(thead_c900_plic, "thead,c900-plic", thead_c900_plic_init); -- 2.25.1