Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754371AbXAAWQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:16:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754379AbXAAWQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:16:39 -0500 Received: from mail-gw3.sa.ew.hu ([212.108.200.82]:50162 "EHLO mail-gw3.sa.ew.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754370AbXAAWQi (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:16:38 -0500 To: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk CC: davem@davemloft.net, arjan@infradead.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org In-reply-to: <20061231173743.GD1702@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (message from Russell King on Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:37:43 +0000) Subject: Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again References: <20061230.212338.92583434.davem@davemloft.net> <20061231092318.GA1702@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1167557242.20929.647.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061231.014756.112264804.davem@davemloft.net> <20061231100007.GC1702@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20061231173743.GD1702@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:15:04 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 39 > > > I'm willing to do that - and I guess this means we can probably do this > > > instead of walking the list of VMAs for the shared mapping, thereby > > > hitting both anonymous and shared mappings with the same code? > > > > But for the get_user_pages() case there's no point, is there? The VMA > > and the virtual address is already available, so trying to find it > > again through RMAP doesn't much make sense. > > > > Users of get_user_pages() don't care about any other mappings (maybe > > ptrace does, I don't know) only about one single user mapping and one > > kernel mapping. > > > > So using flush_dcache_page() there is an overkill, trying to teach it > > about anonymous pages is not the real solution, flush_dcache_page() > > was never meant to be used on anything but file mapped pages. > > It's not actually. For flush_anon_page() we currently have to flush the > user mapping and the kernel mapping. For flush_dcache_page(), it's > exactly the same - we have to flush the kernel mapping and the user > mapping. I was never advocating flush_anon_page(). I was suggesting a _new_ cache operation: flush_kernel_user_page(page, vma, virt_addr) which flushes the kernel mapping and the given user mapping. Just like flush_dcache_page() but without needing to find the user mapping(s). However the cache flushing in kmap/kunmap idea might be cleaner and better. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/