Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755040AbXABCm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:42:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755181AbXABCm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:42:27 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:40799 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755040AbXABCm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:42:27 -0500 Message-Id: <200701020242.l022g4Qc018451@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Alan Cc: Trent Waddington , Bernd Petrovitsch , Erik Mouw , Giuseppe Bilotta , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Open letter to Linux kernel developers (was Re: Binary Drivers) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:09:43 GMT." <20061231170943.4e539935@localhost.localdomain> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <200612162007.32110.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> <4587097D.5070501@opensound.com> <13yc6wkb4m09f$.e9chic96695b.dlg@40tude.net> <200612211816.kBLIGFdf024664@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20061222115921.GT3073@harddisk-recovery.com> <1167568899.3318.39.camel@gimli.at.home> <3d57814d0612310503r282404afgd9b06ca57f44ab3c@mail.gmail.com> <20061231170943.4e539935@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1167705724_6551P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:42:04 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1585 Lines: 39 --==_Exmh_1167705724_6551P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:09:43 GMT, Alan said: > That IP story is for the most part not even credible. If they were worried > about "software IP" they would release hardware docs and let us get on > with writing drivers that may well not be as cool as theirs but would > work. If they had real IPR in their hardware then they would hold patents > on it and would be able to take action against (or license it) to anyone > else making hardware. That would apply even outside the USA where > software patents are generally not valid. > > The only hardware IP they'd need to protect would appear to be anything > that revealed they used other people's IPR without permission or > licenses. Given the Nvidia/3Dfx affair I can see why they would be > worried about that given it cost them $70M and 1 million shares. Hey, I started out *up front* pointing out they can't open-source the drivers because some of the IP is other people's, didn't I? :) --==_Exmh_1167705724_6551P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFFmcZ8cC3lWbTT17ARAkHuAJwKc9tSLtp86MRqTSmpGEWmiNqCQACgyr2y T5Y9YbLFMnFVJTBy9GGr5WM= =bpwv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1167705724_6551P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/