Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp121103pxb; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUfbr6jeON74u+0+8o4kRDj1CJmdszyk+CqglhQBdrO42MNq2rSbVx40w5aZ6/zQJpIhrp X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:198b:: with SMTP id mv11mr13027366pjb.235.1635163783166; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:09:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635163783; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QkdkF9Flm1foclUiJwAOJJrg5zyli6P6JgegrWdo/YN+PVBe5BeAYwZziFXlenjfJx Q5b2VAyDHroIRPmNS0+A+qSmfA6e0/qj3SS47yOPl7dc137BLo+FsscqRWrL8HQgHtBO stlcdBr1HcTzGqVNRtCmf919pXCVub4T7e4hXkjV+RyTjwESbpWkWMzSYqe7BGHMorcT 9+qhqGHqldJnQrG9SoM8djvOYRJRYdbGLULO2N2jCuBBOBzxvX6ZItLKMnbr1luEZ8i6 6YiZe+E0J1o8hI6zyMFMxfgJk03PSCtN9bfG5j8/nDXmhoJKI3tw5X+mXGpQDIba2o4/ l0Vg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=nl0w8I9AlZBKq0I9njUbXHd2O0PnIjEY3ACFyYyGydI=; b=sCrSPu2kS1xROIvghdJhK/hNhWgMN1cUUX9RpznlMfNm2/uM+q2jltt47ayTZY40mq EXdjOUkhDthy66FOPI52tlSHXAASP0yPAhToq+mYw99fHeFGUupsQFx9PHqoVszuITm9 U6N2KulyzaBHZDWGWePG8mI5fxEEVOpOxpFzGQxV390hsO+myxVXNSRANUd7WyeyG5+v +u9+5qPCzvrlabWKv4lR2uUPxEruQ+PRZLjETVEsYi0dZflUgKryqkfg6sU6tIpH75ib svirwbiBiO2+Pm9YGbHyWNngurH7XzwzEJG7As0+fmX3RtAmTHH5WQ/a/hsqUBD6o+By JJHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cdp51ox0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l71si1519742pgd.147.2021.10.25.05.09.29; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cdp51ox0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232657AbhJYMJw (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:09:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:47547 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231358AbhJYMJw (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:09:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635163649; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nl0w8I9AlZBKq0I9njUbXHd2O0PnIjEY3ACFyYyGydI=; b=cdp51ox0g9pQ6E1iP+iN0sW1zG7wfNpzehRKJj6Q91hZjS87nXhQOogQ07iQ8yRRZWZbxj YfsGIgMkvzAB5YCv0VIdC/ROLbVr0Le4WJtqaas/DhXqDXmqXodcnDcvU7X0tJMEyp2aoh m35EK7oeDhtgRZWGeqDJHcwR2bNRUcc= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-16-pIAc4QEfNS6FGsWu4SzsjA-1; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:07:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pIAc4QEfNS6FGsWu4SzsjA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id b81-20020a1c8054000000b0032c9d428b7fso3427999wmd.3 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:07:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nl0w8I9AlZBKq0I9njUbXHd2O0PnIjEY3ACFyYyGydI=; b=D6AXEJt1hYeE4xNobeYEJQZh3zbo0rVfmEaU2yaFmwtU3VqEX4qbd6Mw2CGKSlJ2zT +mGpunovjN1KuOLsVo5m6FDSF38lHyhDHlEeh+pBYrHLluMUcawcdiA9S4fL+7eT9CbE NN20VTlaRytekTKmzDEMCw/5LMfCXl9Ky2cj2pRa9rorXS4eZhYqn7sTWx0t8WI7wnsQ FFGm4HQldbRg/r2fjGKrOwFBLi7K2/KmwaNKnlBkMjXla9rBwhqxtP70n0KVsIwx6NBH 2crwhsrVHVT4LrKqoUXpahuBEmO7xjentc6IVSv+EAh8OuB2rO31jnuevCjlkZWfEczN gAPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533uaZIHy8JbI9CjZX1xThMcOZtKZINOZKGMGWVR08IPvfwlxVv6 +G+seT59XHjCseSdSqRobpGhHPRO1EjGi2lVzivAGsHGBUFoqIeoJl+8NMoe7V2PjQcyFHVamws mNwjy/Gr4yCYqfhb6Gc8eTIKn X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6103:: with SMTP id v3mr20098357wrt.335.1635163646885; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:07:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6103:: with SMTP id v3mr20098308wrt.335.1635163646504; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krava (ip4-95-82-160-78.cust.nbox.cz. [95.82.160.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm6945656wrp.26.2021.10.25.05.07.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:07:23 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: acme@kernel.org, michael@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, namhyung@kernel.org, kjain@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue Message-ID: References: <20211016125059.691856-1-maddy@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211016125059.691856-1-maddy@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 06:20:58PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > branch_stack struct has bit field definition which > produces different bit ordering for big/little endian. > Because of this, when branch_stack sample is collected > in a BE system and viewed/reported in a LE system, bit > fields of the branch stack are not presented properly. > To address this issue, a evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_stack() > is defined and introduced in evsel__parse_sample. > > Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan for both patches Acked-by: Jiri Olsa thanks, jirka > --- > Changelog v1: > - Renamed function and macro > - Added comments in code > > tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 13 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c > index dbfeceb2546c..746e642d4d32 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c > @@ -2221,6 +2221,51 @@ void __weak arch_perf_parse_sample_weight(struct perf_sample *data, > data->weight = *array; > } > > +u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value) > +{ > + u64 new_val = 0; > + > + /* > + * branch_flags > + * union { > + * u64 values; > + * struct { > + * mispred:1 //target mispredicted > + * predicted:1 //target predicted > + * in_tx:1 //in transaction > + * abort:1 //transaction abort > + * cycles:16 //cycle count to last branch > + * type:4 //branch type > + * reserved:40 > + * } > + * } > + * > + * Avoid bswap64() the entire branch_flag.value, > + * as it has variable bit-field sizes. Instead the > + * macro takes the bit-field position/size, > + * swaps it based on the host endianness. > + */ > + if (bigendian()) { > + new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 0, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 1, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 2, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 3, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 4, 16); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 20, 4); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 24, 40); > + } else { > + new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 63, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 62, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 61, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 60, 1); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 44, 16); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 40, 4); > + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 0, 40); > + } > + > + return new_val; > +} > + > int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event, > struct perf_sample *data) > { > @@ -2408,6 +2453,8 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event, > if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) { > const u64 max_branch_nr = UINT64_MAX / > sizeof(struct branch_entry); > + struct branch_entry *e; > + unsigned int i; > > OVERFLOW_CHECK_u64(array); > data->branch_stack = (struct branch_stack *)array++; > @@ -2416,10 +2463,33 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event, > return -EFAULT; > > sz = data->branch_stack->nr * sizeof(struct branch_entry); > - if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel)) > + if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel)) { > sz += sizeof(u64); > - else > + e = &data->branch_stack->entries[0]; > + } else { > data->no_hw_idx = true; > + /* > + * if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, > + * only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel. > + */ > + e = (struct branch_entry *)&data->branch_stack->hw_idx; > + } > + > + if (swapped) { > + /* > + * struct branch_flag does not have endian > + * specific bit field definition. And bswap > + * will not resolve the issue, since these > + * are bit fields. > + * > + * evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags() uses a > + * bitfield_swap macro to swap the bit position > + * based on the host endians. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < data->branch_stack->nr; i++, e++) > + e->flags.value = evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(e->flags.value); > + } > + > OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size); > array = (void *)array + sz; > } > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h > index 1f7edfa8568a..2e82cdbe2c08 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h > @@ -482,4 +482,17 @@ struct evsel *evsel__leader(struct evsel *evsel); > bool evsel__has_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader); > bool evsel__is_leader(struct evsel *evsel); > void evsel__set_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader); > + > +/* > + * Macro to swap the bit-field postition and size. > + * Used when, > + * - dont need to swap the entire u64 && > + * - when u64 has variable bit-field sizes && > + * - when presented in a host endian which is different > + * than the source endian of the perf.data file > + */ > +#define bitfield_swap(src, pos, size) \ > + ((((src) >> (pos)) & ((1ull << (size)) - 1)) << (63 - ((pos) + (size) - 1))) > + > +u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value); > #endif /* __PERF_EVSEL_H */ > -- > 2.31.1 >