Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp568175pxb; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbmHZo6ybCDYi5jnSeXhf1I/dNMCRl/hk05MlSUGCh5CaIrJNAkp+Y/F93On9j6zFaWEzV X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:96a5:: with SMTP id hd37mr14439900ejc.423.1635195481168; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635195481; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C89ogM7lMfrSWsNs5EN1NYWve7jukbGn+aqvkY1K4yCNLofeUZcZUULDl8kva/3DQd Xp60y2vBzfOxBO8Iah2JZueeJD7oFKrpvt7dd4jdK3++Oke/jKCVLE35OkUQxONdGP2D wqRO8SOKx0LPQzrTk/I6jOfSSCuQ9XHiPBsB2V8BSPNM0w1d/0Pr+sQG13zqjSDoSNlb PvDBk7v9b0Yvq9htNPawyFXObFq2Fiord/TnKm48zHMgnz96ewJ0b2yyhXC1hmnoFp2n H8vAS4Q5OjKoVssmEf5FDEstT/RBGtWwa22aLmcoQj7AedO8D+uPb5yx0F3iptjKecGc RtCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=Ca2T3OhpiDUagIAQGYONujC4KPLolgtPTM5f5ml4T18=; b=xapRLfmUbVd5IqOs/nLpOwurOHrrF59Pg0HReqBLNSSbMv455OZgX1UbKyCZigwhnx pB9uGCTSU+y2xtRDke3b5vO3ONFBWvuhuc2D4T3kI3MveOjMeQx5JQULs0u6zUqv+6SN eIDYOsKxJ2xQi+XS30VpcAHcGAbveBiw3QP8lnABoNSlKZ6xbJ8kO0JPQyb/Lx91FLDH GlR/myLRbGgIjZ30z3Vl6VkNhdlc6Zvdt+U7EJMkv0HItSJRoysHYiDjVQwXP3PNSzN8 PJ+OXkYkWYMrl6x5wgJrQmIbbsUYyZsM8oCtj8xXXUhpSo6lKSeKKGn0uwOIiEloQdQ5 sj8g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r21si656641edb.376.2021.10.25.13.57.35; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234254AbhJYU6A (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:58:00 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:56310 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234566AbhJYU5q (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:57:46 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:46434) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mf706-00AmGX-0a; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:55:22 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:39982 helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mf704-00CQtV-7C; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:55:21 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Al Viro , Kees Cook , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org References: <87y26nmwkb.fsf@disp2133> <20211020174406.17889-5-ebiederm@xmission.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:55:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:24:17 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87y26gx1se.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mf704-00CQtV-7C;;;mid=<87y26gx1se.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+evW9omsIww1rKO9bifehdIM1qfwCNJao= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.1 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TR_Symld_Words,TR_XM_SB_Phish,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG, T_TooManySym_01,T_TooManySym_02,T_TooManySym_03,T_TooManySym_04, T_TooManySym_05,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong,XMSubPhish11 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 TR_Symld_Words too many words that have symbols inside * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_05 8+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_03 6+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_04 7+ unique symbols in subject * 1.5 XMSubPhish11 Phishy Language Subject * 0.0 TR_XM_SB_Phish Phishing flag in subject of message X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *****;"Maciej W. Rozycki" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 564 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.4 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 3.0 (0.5%), parse: 0.92 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 10 (1.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.94 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.5 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.18 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 0.80 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 99 (17.6%), check_bayes: 97 (17.2%), b_tokenize: 3.8 (0.7%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.0%), b_comp_prob: 1.40 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 83 (14.7%), b_finish: 0.87 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 163 (28.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.36 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 1.87 (0.3%), poll_dns_idle: 257 (45.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 275 (48.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] signal/mips: Update (_save|_restore)_fp_context to fail with -EFAULT X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Maciej W. Rozycki" writes: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> When an instruction to save or restore a register from the stack fails >> in _save_fp_context or _restore_fp_context return with -EFAULT. This >> change was made to r2300_fpu.S[1] but it looks like it got lost with >> the introduction of EX2[2]. This is also what the other implementation >> of _save_fp_context and _restore_fp_context in r4k_fpu.S does, and >> what is needed for the callers to be able to handle the error. > > Umm, right, good catch, thanks! I think this ought to be backported. > > Acked-by: Maciej W. Rozycki > I will add a CC stable. So it can be backported after it is merged. Eric