Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp600598pxb; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:41:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvxIU3TShMgcsArTkAH19D+XU6c8FBp0ZEkhDFSHDG1q95u5IEMHyaXclDEi1eD+tXE8GM X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1bc6:: with SMTP id oa6mr38541700pjb.206.1635198071252; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:41:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635198071; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aYegEWdjeB3dCxv/4oQbm53dl7bwaPByt0y27J3fZR4uphnI1PAEBiS1/dwArZBLQ7 r42OJ+c3972Z2e/E3wQG5yl3P23t7wCwKLksytonHrtkNDZjmZSicGVOCVuRPfTCjDpc qJ8uV67bxOHzC0P+BBy8aFNF2vTyCQUb6JKtdm9BzpsAbHBtz6dXtB7Npjs7MmV/yWwe 2IlWCvPAYdXnoIFv8Rde6TkMjZBUZwGGDqjepxhBIGNsy4cRAbC5SqDMJeY83I2/dVL0 hptCG0HZU2wpiFPJYl4wXcQsX2fy/afn4sVeaHnUHVT1HgZ7UdnKyIertp6tOiiTsW3r rrCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=QkyoC/NexH1Nu0O2R4wJhF/62iz6WrFzKuF9woFeRsA=; b=0G/NKE2QkYwKMY1v0ZKpWZxnPwuShlM29n4fUMTwUAsR6Nup7jbFlzzkloorRx3PII q2BLbF67TYAuCsw3XMig+NZbbgC89BoECERfrbTMltGdS4xoGEAld1kLKoq+qvgJPC4i 2PJdU5xB2QPouJRn4bbp82GCJfOdZT92kWSA1yXpMyvmtjyj6Y1feDscVqS1Nx7SAt5o CT3e3jNBxcvGYXNKbbREm+NCefSrZXmVt5sAu/7h2y3YmjbuqbRxcB/oQNwrTMnlLq83 zSCBoSj2kKjiaj9Zt8BBaa+RV8Eje24sEfdRcw6nnSC9aN9cMY+6X+FaHBOGsf1xhjh8 xFKw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FMgtWL46; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k15si33050940pgg.579.2021.10.25.14.40.57; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FMgtWL46; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233732AbhJYTDV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:03:21 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:48418 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233719AbhJYTDU (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:03:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635188458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QkyoC/NexH1Nu0O2R4wJhF/62iz6WrFzKuF9woFeRsA=; b=FMgtWL46advIFc7a6Z4Daj5ZHup5t8m+GSfyUGpbsOs3yNJiysWmY6X4so8zxrrF8RdYHb KYr9DvZLg1Rwjnlg9PbS+aoALmXhDNDC4lZIhyj10VO5tixNxrwqy2IIBOa97gYtty03QF hA+w8TXa7lI0lp/nfm32RH8f4G3KqQ0= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-267-NDeFFj-BNW2zmvHWaONXBQ-1; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:00:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: NDeFFj-BNW2zmvHWaONXBQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id d10-20020adffd8a000000b00167f0846597so2904234wrr.16 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:00:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QkyoC/NexH1Nu0O2R4wJhF/62iz6WrFzKuF9woFeRsA=; b=uCtutGaDd5ZeHYiy8jRBWiBpS0LacaxRnPquOe7upCNhY5y9I1px1Hq2jQ9VSGBhya R58JCpmcSg6DsmPMXHxJXsEa0HtzBp1lspypOcKYLUHHL+/kJ11DMPnlzRth0qSH++jo nCSFAArSUGapKnGXUAF46Q6Pup0MUdkLJzRRDXf+7IfbS51NAHZJ9DpStMtMpYb8ojl/ ZxPNWvQN1xVQS/Or4Aj9Nd/TySMGyX3pU2u6u2CuIi+x0s0QcbtaH8q9PCAfj1WSfaPH jKGH4ohajuhwxOl0JeZSB4h0y6CJGGp25MwXPF5nHooj4E3w/5tf96d6RFkKj2Fvz15X 8R2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dpIJb7n1X1hOQ+QG6RR07oJYIJcesCUC3GsEygQDCtYmbVS59 yAu1llpY5U8/MzszH97kzdIJ1JjoTESNKLSLEFO070djG8ighwmkhb/KnHKqULnTIGHA56ddPN7 fuBTsFZsvBvNCG/83DgqcL20JDDOOaM+LM2kUu3R+ X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c74f:: with SMTP id w15mr21890331wmk.186.1635188455482; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c74f:: with SMTP id w15mr21890297wmk.186.1635188455236; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211019134204.3382645-1-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andreas Gruenbacher Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:00:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Catalin Marinas , Paul Mackerras , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , cluster-devel , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:23 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:06 AM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Probing only the first byte(s) in fault_in() would be ideal, no need to > > go through all filesystems and try to change the uaccess/probing order. > > Let's try that. Or rather: probing just the first page - since there > are users like that btrfs ioctl, and the direct-io path. For direct I/O, we actually only want to trigger page fault-in so that we can grab page references with bio_iov_iter_get_pages. Probing for sub-page error domains will only slow things down. If we hit -EFAULT during the actual copy-in or copy-out, we know that the error can't be page fault related. Similarly, in the buffered I/O case, we only really care about the next byte, so any probing beyond that is unnecessary. So maybe we should split the sub-page error domain probing off from the fault-in functions. Or at least add an argument to the fault-in functions that specifies the amount of memory to probe. Thanks, Andreas